Kursinga Bujju v. Sro Prakash Goud
Case brief
What is this about?
IN PERSON AFTER ADMISSION (SEE RULE 18) IN…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FORM-I NOTICE FOR APPEARANCE IN PERSON AFTER ADMISSION (SEE RULE 18) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND SIX
: PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1143 OF 2006.
Between:-
1. Kursinga Bujju S/o. Lasmu (Laxman)
2. Ade Jangu S/o. Lasmu (Laxman)
3. Kursinga Manku S/o. Bheemu
4. Kursinga Banchu S/o. Bheemu
5. Smt. RatnamGantamma W/o. Pochamallu
6. Smt.Kaman Amai W/o. Kistaiah
7. Penkarala Pantingu S/o. Mallaiah
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioners (Kursinga Bujju and others)
- respondent
Sri Prakash Goud
- respondent
Sri Subba Rao
- respondent
Sri D.C. Rosaiah
- respondent
Senior Civil Judge, Asifabad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1143/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court