Dismissed

G.V.G. Krishna Murali S/o late Pulla Rao v. The Commissioner of Land Revenue and Urban Land

Telangana HC17 Jan 2005WP/8795/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners in a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking relief against land grabbers withdrew the petition; the High Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; the petition dismissed as withdrawn.

G.V.G. Krishna Murali S/o late Pulla Rao Vs The… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2005)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 8795 of 2004

¶8

Between:

¶9

1 G.V.G. Krishna Murali S/o late Pulla Rao

¶10

R/o 16-18-32, Guntur

¶11

2 G. Soma Sekhera Rao S/o late Pulla Rao

¶12

R/o M.C.H. No. 546, Gandhinagar, Secunderabad

¶13

3 G.J. Samantha Rao S/o late Pulla Rao,

¶14

R/o 16-18-32, Old Guntur.

¶15

4 G. Rupa Chandra Rao S/o late G. Pulla Rao

¶16

R/o 16-18-32. Guntur

¶17

5 G.Ch. Gopala Rao S/o late G. Pulla Rao

¶18

Agricultrue R/o Kaman Road, Khammam

¶19

6 G.S. Mahadeva Rao S/o late G. Pulla Rao

¶20

R/o Sharaf Bazar, Tenali

¶21

... PETITIONERS

¶22

AND

¶23

1 The Commissioner of Land Revenue and Urban Land Ceilings

¶24

and the Appellate Authority Under the

¶25

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976, Hyderabad 2 Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings,

¶26

Guntur,

¶27

3 The District Collector, Guntur District at Guntur

¶28

4 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur

¶29

...RESPONDENTS

¶30

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents instigating and encouraging the land

¶31

grabbers to grab the petitioners land as null and void Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.H.V.R.R.SWAMY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶32

The Court, at the admission stage, made the following:

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

¶35

Permission is granted.

¶36

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

N. V. RAMANA, J

January 17, 2005

MRR

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

// TRUE COPY //

SECTION OFFICER

Copy to:

1 The Commissioner of Land Revenue and Urban Land Ceilings

¶45

and the Appellate Authority Under the

¶46

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976, Hyderabad 2 Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings,

¶47

Guntur,

¶48

3 The District Collector, Guntur District at Guntur

¶49

4 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur

¶50

5 Two C.D. Copies.

G.V.G. Krishna Murali S/o late Pulla Rao v. The Commissioner of Land Revenue and Urban Land

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.V.G. Krishna Murali S/o late Pulla Rao v. The Commissioner of Land Revenue and Urban Land

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Karan Woosin Limited a Company incorporated under Vs The Union of India Ministryof Labour New

Mokhamatla Sanjeeva Rao Vs The District Collector

A.Krishnaiah, Vs The District Collector, Chittoor District

Raparthi Hanumantha Rao, Vs The Mandal Revenue Officer

Ravuri Chengaiah Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Sanapureddy Radhakrishna Reddy, Vs The District Collector and Chairman