This writ petition dismissed as the court ruled that the disputed question regarding direct engagement versus contractor employment was not examinable in this statutory proceeding.
The writ petition was dismissed; liberty granted to approach Labour Court or other authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 7005 of 1999
Between:
Lingam Ashok Kumar and another
..... PETITIONERS
AND
The Vice Chairman & MD, APSRTC,
Musheerabad, Hyderabad and 4 others
.....RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
The disputed fact as to whether the petitioners were directly engaged by the respondent Corporation or they were engaged through a contractor, cannot be gone into in this writ petition.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach Labour Court or any authority and work out their remedies as available under law. No order as to costs.
C.V.RAMULU,J
Dated: 03.08.2005
Dsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the disputed question of employment status and direct engagement between petitioners and the corporation is maintainable in a writ petition.
Lingam Ashok Kumar and another
The Vice Chairman & MD, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and 4 others
C.V. RAMULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
