were promoted and therefore, he and others filed R.P.No.2124 of 1988 for issuance of the directions to the concerned to give promotions to them as Audio Visual Supervisor by reverting the persons mentioned above. The tribunal by its order dated 23-12-1988 directed the concerned officials to revert the unqualified persons in question, and accordingly, they were reverted to the posts of Cinema operators. He filed R.M.P.No.1674 of 1999 with Rev. R.M.P.No.2753 of 1999 in R.P.No.2124 of 1988 seeking to condone the delay and also to clarify the order dated 23-12-1988 and accordingly, the tribunal modified the orders with a direction to the concerned officials to consider his case for regular promotion even before the other candidates are considered for promotion after their acquisition of qualification on the ground that he is already qualified. In view of non-implementation of the orders of the Tribunal, 2nd respondent- writ petitioner filed writ petition No.16977 of 1989 seeking a direction to the concerned officials to implement the orders of the Tribunal. This Court by an order dated 26-12-1989 in W.P.M.P.No.22489 of 1989 in W.P.No.16977 of 1989 directed the concerned officials to implement the same within one month from the date of the order passed by this Court. Accordingly, the concerned officials promoted him to the post of Audio Visual Supervisor reverting the 3rd respondent. Aggrieved by the same, the applicant filed O.A.3315 of 1989 before the Tribunal, and the Tribunal by its order dated 08-02-1996 allowed the O.A. holding that the applicant is senior to the 2nd respondent. Aggrieved by the same, he filed Rev. M.A. No. 746 of 1996 in O.A.No.3315 of 1989 on the ground that there is an error apparent on the face of the record as the applicant did not possess the required qualification to hold the post of Visual Supervisor. The Tribunal has in turn disposed of the same holding that the scope of the review is very limited and therefore, it cannot be entertained. Aggrieved by the same, he filed writ petition No.26428 of 1999 before this Court and this Court by an order dated 30-1-2001 allowed the same setting aside the order dated 26-10-1999 remitting back the matter for fresh consideration on merits. Accordingly, a Division Bench of the Tribunal on 27-3-2003 allowed the M.A. No.746 of 1996 in O.A. No.3015 of 1989 holding that the order passed by the Tribunal in R. Ps. and the clarificatory order were not considered by the tribunal while disposing of O.A.No.3315 of 1989, and further directed the O.A. to be heard on merits. The Tribunal allowed the O.A. filed by the applicant by its order dated 10-09-2003. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition has been filed by the writ petitioner.
