The petitioner seeking a writ under Article 226 for violating building rules was granted permission to withdraw the petition. The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted. Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION NO : 22286 of 2004
Between:
T.V.S.Murthy, S/o.Late Subbarayudu, Occu: Govt. Employee, R/o.H.NO. 10-45/3,
New Gaddiannaram Colony,
Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1. Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, rep.by
its Vice Chairman, Begumpet, Hyderabad.
2. The Municipal Commissioner, Gaddiannaram Municipality,
Gaddiannaram, Ranga Reddy District.
3. Ambati Venkata Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o.Venkateswar Rao,
4. M/s. S.V.Associates, rep.by its partner, Venkateshwarlu @
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not taking action against the 3rd and 4th Respondents who are proceeding with the construction in premises No.10-37/16 and 10-36/16 situated at Gaddiannaram, Dilsukhnagar without leaving mandatory set-backs is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.423 dated 31-71998 and Building Rules.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.E.SAMBASIVA PRATAP
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR. M.S.RAJU,
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR. P.RADHA KRISHNA, S.C. FOR MUNICIPALITIES (T.A.).
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3&4: None appeared.
The Court made the following :
O R D E R :
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission is granted.
Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, J.
Dated: 15th March, 2005.
cs
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
To 1. The Vice Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 2. The Municipal Commissioner, Gaddiannaram Municipality,
Gaddiannaram, Ranga Reddy District. 3. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JA}
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.V.S.Murthy
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority
The Municipal Commissioner
Ambati Venkata Vijaya Lakshmi
M/s. S.V.Associates
C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
