A two-judge bench dismissed this writ petition challenging an order of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, noting that the order is appealable and no special reasons exist for immediate interference.
Writ petition dismissed; liberty to seek remedy by way of appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI BILAL NAZKI
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 21726 OF 2005
Dated 5th October, 2005
Between:
Juluri Sarada W/o U.Shankar
…Petitioner
And
A.Rachaiah S/o A.Buchaiah … Respondent.
ORAL ORDER:
(per Honourable Sri Bilal Nazki, the Acting Chief Justice)
The order of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission challenged in the writ petition is appealable. We do not find any special reasons to interfere in the order. The Writ Petition, therefore, is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to seek his remedy by way of appeal. No costs.
BILAL NAZKI, ACJ.
5.10.2005.
R.SUBHASH REDDY, J.
VR.
Juluri Sarada
A. Rachaiah
Bilal Nazki
Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
