“ At the outset, it is to be submitted that the writ petition is misconceived one and the same is liable to be dismissed with costs. Neither the petitioner nor the executors of the Memorandum of Mutual Understanding have any right or title on the Survey Nos.210/1 to 210/4. As such, this respondent issued Memo dated 13.06.03 to the petitioner informing that on verification of Pahani for the year 20012002 that he is neither the pattadar nor possessor over the above survey numbers. Hence the request of the petitioner for demarcation is rejected. As a matter of fact, Sy.No.210/1 was deleted from Moosapet village and Sy.Nos.362 to 373 were included as lands in Kukatpally village. The same was confirmed by the hon’ble Supreme Court in civil Appeal No.2630/1989. Suppressing the above facts, the petitioner has approached the Hon’ble Court with a mala fide intention to obtain favourable orders. Since the petitioner has no right or claim over the lands in question and moreover he is not in possession of lands, other allegations made in the writ petition need not be traversed.”
