N.Dharma Reddy Kurnool v. the Govt of A.P. Its Sec H.D. HYDAND2ORS
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a default dismissal order. The petitioner was absent without representation, and the High Court dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
This is a default dismissal order. The petitioner was absent without representation, and the High Court dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITIO No.2045 of 2000
Between:
N.Dharma Reddy, s/o.N. Veera Reddy, R/o.Allagadda, Kurnool District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
rep.by its Secretary, Home Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector-cum-Magistrate,
Kurnool, Kurnool District.
3. The Station House Officer, Allagadda Police Station, Allagadda, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing G.O.Rt.No.1941 Home (General.C) Department, dated 27-7-1999 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 19 (1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India so far as the petitioner is concerned and consequently direct the respondents to return DBBL Gun No.23414-1990 2) N.P. Bore Revolver after renewing the licence.
Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.V.H.V.R.R.SWAMY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following :
ORDER :
This is an old matter appearing in the list since yesterday. Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default/non-prosecution. No costs.
_______________ (V.V.S. RAO, J.) 10-06-2005.
Msr.
To
1. The Secretary, Home Department, Government of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector-cum-Magistrate, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Station House Officer, Allagadda Police Station, Allagadda, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
4. 2 CCs to Government Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.
5 2 CD copies.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO
WRIT PETITION No.2045 of 2000
10-06-2005
(Msr)
N.Dharma Reddy
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Home Department
The District Collector-cum-Magistrate, Kurnool
The Station House Officer, Allagadda Police Station
V.V.S. RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court