The High Court disposed of two writ petitions via a compromise memo signed by the parties, ordering no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
W.P.M.P.No.31375 OF 2005
&
WRIT PETITION No.11636 OF 2004
Dated 13-12-2005
W.P.M.P.No.31375 OF 2005
Between :
Kothuru Sree Rama Murthy son of Seetharamaiah, Hindu, aged 85 years, Cherukupallivari Street, Near Sapthagiri College, Governor Pet, Vijayawada.
….Petitioner.
And :
1. Special Officer for A.P. Tenancy Cases/II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada and others.
…Respondents.
WRIT PETITION No.11636 OF 2004
Between :
Kothuru Sree Rama Murthy son of Seetharamaiah, Hindu, aged 85 years, Cherukupallivari Street, Near Sapthagiri College, Governor Pet, Vijayawada.
….Petitioner.
And :
1. Special Officer for A.P. Tenancy Cases/II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada and others.
…Respondents.
ORDER :
The above W.P.M.P. No.31375 of 2005 has been filed by the petitioner to dispose of the main writ petition in view of the matter being compromised by the parties.
2. Compromise memo has been filed by the petitioner and respondents 3 to 6. Accordingly, W.P.M.P. No. 31375 of 2005 is ordered.
3. In view of the orders passed in W.P.M.P. No.31375 of 2005, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of compromise. Compromise memo signed by the petitioner as well as the unofficial respondents (Respondents 3 to 6) has been placed on record. No costs.
Justice B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
Date : 13-12-2005.
Dvs
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
W.P.M.P.No.31375 OF 2005
&
WRIT PETITION No.11636 OF 2004
Dated 13-12-2005
Kothuru Sree Rama Murthy
Special Officer for A.P. Tenancy Cases
II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada
B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
