This single-paragraph order dismissed a writ petition arising from a dispute over salary arrears. The court relied on a previous judgment of the same court to reject the challenge against proceedings by the fourth respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION NO : 7876 of 2004
Between:
1. V.Sreenivasa Rao Samba Murthy, Jannavaram Primary Agricultural
Coop. Society Ltd., Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2. M.Sanyasi Raju S/o. Suryanarayana Raju Jannavaram Primary Agricultural Coop. Society Ltd., Chodavaram
Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 3. K.Venkata Rao S/o. Sanyasayya Jannavaram Primary Agricultural Coop. Society Ltd., Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4. B.Demullu S/o. SanyasiJannavaram Primary Agricultural Coop.
Society Ltd., Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
1. The Government of A.P. Coperation Department rep. by its
Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Visakhapatnam District Coop.Central Bank Ltd., rep by its
General Manager, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
3. The District Coop.Officer Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
4. The divisional Coop. Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
5. Jannavaram Primary Agricultural Coop. Society Ltd., Chodavaram
Mandal, Visakhapatnam, District rep by its Chairman/President.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to
issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 4th respondent in RC.No.500/2002-B (45) dated 29-7-2003 as illegal, arbitrary and hit by Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to pay the salaries to the petitioners as it were in existence as on the date of stoppage of the salaries.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.SATYA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr. S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the respondents 1 and 3 to 5: GP for Cooperation
The Court made the following:
O R D E R :
This matter is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.3171 of 2003 and batch, dated 30.8.2004.
2. Following the said judgment, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
V. ESWARAIAH, J
Dated: 04-11-2004.
ccm
To
1. The Secretary, The Government of A.P. Coperation
Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Visakhapatnam District Coop.Central Bank Ltd., Visakhapatnam,
Visakhapatnam District.
3. The District Coop.Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The divisional Coop. Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam
District.
5. The Chairman/President, Jannavaram Primary Agricultural Coop.
Society Ltd., Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam, District
6. 2 CC copies to GP for cooperation, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
7. 2 CD copies.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.3171 of 2003Followed¶28
V.Sreenivasa Rao Samba Murthy and others
The Government of A.P. Cooperation Department and others
V. ESWARAIAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
