The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging revenue proceedings under Article 226, holding that the controversy was squarely covered by a prior judgment of itself.
None, the writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 17783 of 2004
Between:
Society for Training and Employment Promotion (STEP), Regd No.102/1981 rep. by its Manager P.Ramachandra Rao s/o.Venkateswarlu Swasakthi Buildings, Opp. to Bharathi Kammavari Thota, Guntur, Guntur District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Finance and Planning (Fin.Wing-EBSRev) Development, rep by its Secretary Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Nampally, Hyderabad 3 The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Eluru Bazar, Guntur Guntur District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in Rc.No.75/2004-A5, dated 3.8.2004 are illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.48, dated 15.3.1997 and set aside the same by declaring the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MD.SALEEM
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAXES
The Court made the following :
ORDER: (per BN,J)
The controversy raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by a Judgment of this Court in W.P.No.1516 of 2004, dated 25-10-2004.
Following the same, the present writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
BILAL NAZKI,J
Dated:17-11-2004
S.ANADA REDDY,J
GJ
To
1 The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh Finance and Planning (Fin.Wing-EBS-Rev) Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Nampally, Hyderabad 3 The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Eluru Bazar, Guntur Guntur District.
4 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.(OUT)
5 Two C.D. copies.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in Rc.No.75/2004-A5 are illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.1516 of 2004, dated 25-10-2004Followed¶18
Society for Training and Employment Promotion (STEP)
Government of Andhra Pradesh Finance and Planning
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Bilal Nazki
S. Ananda Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
