K.V.V.S. Narayana, v. S. Vivekananda
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court admitted a Contempt petition against the A.P.S.R.T.C. Regional Manager for non-implementation of orders in W.P. No. 10957 of 2001. The Court rejected the plea for condonation of delay and ordered a strict notice for appearance, noting the embezzlement of back wages for over ten months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FORM-I
NOTICE FOR APPEARANCE IN PERSON AFTER ADMISSION
(SEE RULE 18)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
: PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE : V. ESWARAIAH
CONTEMPT CASE No. 704 of 2004
Between:
K.V.V.S. Narayana.
PETITIONER
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent shall be held guilty of contempt for willful disobedience in not fully implementing the orders of the High Court.
Whether the delaying tactics and non-payment of arrears by the respondent justify punishment for contempt.
Whether the respondent is eligible to file an application to dispense with punishment upon full implementation of the Court's order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.V.V.S. Narayana
- respondent
S. Vivekananda
Coram
V. Eswareiah
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/704/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court