Allowed
Reliance Communication Ltd. v. Union of India
TDSATTELECOM PETITION/25/2013
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
Dated 28th October, 2015
Petition No. 25 of 2013
Reliance Communication Ltd. …Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India
…Respondent
Petition No. 138 of 2013
Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi
…Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India
…Respondent
BEFORE:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. KULDIP SINGH, MEMBER HON’BLE MR.B.B.SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER
For Petitioner : Mr. Navin Chawla, Advocate Ms. Manali Singhal, Advocate Mr. Santosh Sachin, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Advocate Mr. K.P.S. Kohli, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate Ms. Neha Singh, Advocate
2
ORDER
These two petitions are allowed for the reasons stated in and in the same
terms as the judgment dated 28.10.2015 in petition no.24 of 2013 (Reliance
Telecom Ltd. Vs. Union of India).
….…………….
(Aftab Alam) Chairperson
..………………. (Kuldip Singh) Member
...….…………….
(B.B. Srivastava) Member
sks
3
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Reliance Telecom Ltd. Vs. Union of IndiaExplained¶19
petition no.24 of 2013 (Reliance Telecom Ltd. Vs. Union of India)
Reliance Communication Ltd.
Union of India
Aftab Alam
Kuldip Singh
B.B. Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
A petition before TDSAT in a dispute between a licensor, a licensee or a service provider under the TRAI Act.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court