Allowed

Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhumati Cable Network

TDSAT10 Dec 2015BROADCASTING PETITION/201/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal allowed the petitioner's petition for recovery of subscription fees dues up to 31.03.2013 from the respondent cable operator based on an interconnect agreement, holding the claim beyond that date unsustainable. The petitioner is directed to file a computation of accounts for issuing a decree.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file computation of accounts up to 31.03.2013 for decree with interest @ 10% per annum.

Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. vs… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | TDSAT (2015)

¶1

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

¶2

Dated 10^th December, 2015

¶3

Petition No. 201 (C) of 2014

¶4

Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

¶5

…Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

M/s Madhumati Cable Network

¶8

…Respondent

¶9

BEFORE:

¶10

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. KULDIP SINGH, MEMBER

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. Upender Thakur, Advocate For Respondent : None

¶12

ORDER

¶13

By Aftab Alam, Chairperson – The petitioner, M/s Media Pro Enterprise

¶14

India Pvt. Ltd. (Media Pro), has filed this petition for recovery of the sum of Rs.8,03,125/-, along with interest @ 18% per annum from the petitioner as dues of subscription fee.

¶15

¶16

According to Media Pro, the respondent (a local cable operator) executed an interconnect agreement with it on 20.06.2012 for supply of its signals to the respondent for retransmission. The agreement commenced from 01.04.2012 and came to end on 31.03.2013. In terms of the agreement, the respondent was required to pay Rs.99,000.66p to Media Pro as the monthly subscription fee.

¶17

It is the case of Media Pro that in terms of the agreement it supplied its signals to the respondent until the supply was disconnected on 18.10.2013. It raised invoices for payment of monthly subscription fee but the respondent defaulted in payments and as a result the dues of subscription fee accumulated to Rs.8,03,125/-, for the recovery of which this petition is filed.

¶18

The respondent did not appear despite service of notice and hence, the petition has proceeded ex parte.

¶19

Media Pro, in support of its claim, has examined a witness, Mr. Amiya Ranjan Pati who worked as DGM (Credit Risk Manager) for the petitioner. The witness has supported the petitioner’s claim. He proved the agreement dated 20.06.2012 by the respondent with Media Pro which was marked as Exhibit PW1/1. He also proved the invoices raised by the Media Pro which were collectively marked as Exhibit PW-1/2. The witness also proved the statement of account

¶20

¶21

showing the outstanding payable by the respondent which was marked as Exhibit PW-1/3.

¶22

The pleadings and the evidences, in so far Media Pro’s claim based on the interconnect agreement dated 20.06.2012 is concerned, remain un-rebutted by the respondent.

¶23

Therefore, there is no reason not to accept the claim of Media Pro for the term of the agreement that came to end on 31.03.2013.

¶24

The claim of Media Pro, however, extends to 18.10.2013 as it is claimed that it continued to supply signals to the respondent till that date. In the absence of any renewal agreement, the claim beyond 31.03.2013 would be unsustainable as the supply of signals, even if in fact made, would be in violation of clause 4A of the Interconnect Regulations.

¶25

For the reasons discussed above, we accept the claim of Media Pro upto 31.03.2013 and hold it entitled to recover its dues upto that date from the respondent.

¶26

Media Pro is directed to file a computation of accounts upto 31.03.2013 within two weeks from today for the office to draw-up a decree accordingly. The

¶27

¶28

decretal amount will also carry interest @ 10% per annum from the date of filing

¶29

of the petition till the actual payment.

¶30

………………. (AftabAlam) Chairperson

¶31

……………….. (Kuldip Singh) Member

¶32

sks

Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhumati Cable Network

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhumati Cable Network

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Msm Discovery Pvt. Ltd. vs Bongaigaon Cable

Maharaja Telesystem Pvt. Ltd. vs Den Networks Ltd.

Manthan Broadband Service Pvt. Ltd. vs Inx News Pvt. Ltd.

Darpita Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Sahara India

India Cast Utv Media Distribution Pvt. Ltd. vs S.R. Cable Tv Pvt. Ltd.

Msm Discovery Pvt. Ltd. vs Sr Cable Tv Pvt. Ltd.

Hinduja Global Solutions Ltd. (Earlier Known as Nxt Digital Ltd.) vs Om Cable Tv

Hinduja Global Solutions Ltd. (Earlier Known as Nxt Digital Ltd.) vs Vipin Sehrawat and Anr.

Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. vs Union of India &Amp; Anr.

Reliance Communication Ltd. vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt. Ltd. vs Ambala Communication Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Asianet Satellite Communication Ltd. vs Sathyadhara Communications Pvt. Ltd.

Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. vs Shiva Cable Network

Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. vs Mauli Cable Network