Mr.P.P. Malhotra, the learned ASG on the other hand submitted that the grounds on which review has been sought by the petitioners are not available to them. Scope of review is limited. According to the learned ASG, the petitioners are in fact arguing for re-hearing of the matter and seeking further reliefs. This Tribunal was alive to the points being raised by the petitioners now and has considered the same while giving its order. Therefore, this cannot be said to be a case of error apparent on the face of the record and the Review Applications are liable to be dismissed on this ground alone. On merits he submits that the occasion for the penultimate paragraph in the order, which has been quoted above, arose because the TRAI in its recommendations had said that the same should be made effective from a prospective date. This Tribunal was considering whether the recommendations should be made prospective or retrospective. This aspect was considered by the Tribunal in the last two pages of its order and the concluding portion of the order shows that this Tribunal has taken conscious decision on the aspect on which review is now sought by the petitioners.
