Shri Sai Vision v. Star India Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner No.2 was a cable operator receiving signals from Petitioner No.1 (an MSO of Respondent No.1). The Tribunal directed Petitioner No.2 to approach Respondent No.1, who must nominate an MSO to supply signals to Petitioner No.2 upon signing a subscription agreement, subject to Interconnection Regulations.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Petitioner No.2 to approach Respondent No.1 for signals via a nominated MSO upon subscription agreement.