Non-appearance warrant case where the petitioner failed to appear. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the petition under Petition No. 50(C) of 2005 for default without hearing.
Petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
6/7/2018
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
DATED 5TH AUGUST, 2005
Petition No.50(C) of 2005
(M.A.No. 140 of 2005)
Naidu Cable Network Bherwali …Petitioner Vs.
Surya Enterprises …Respondent
BEFORE:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE, CHAIRPERSON MR. VINOD VAISH, MEMBER LT.GEN.D.P.SEHGAL(RETD.),MEMBER
For : Petitioner
None
O R D E R
None appears for the petitioner. Petition is dismissed for default.
…..……………..J (N.Santosh Hegde) Chairperson
…………….. (Vinod Vaish) Member
………………. (D.P.Sehgal) Member
file:///E:/all%20judgement%20year%20wise/judgement%202005/Petition%20No.50(C).htm
1/1
Naidu Cable Network Bherwali
Surya Enterprises
N. Santosh Hegde
Vinod Vaish
D.P. Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition before the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal in a broadcasting or cable-distribution dispute.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
