This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
DATED 19th SEPTEMBER, 2002
PETITION No. 5 OF 2001
(With M.A. No. 46 of 2001)
Cellular Operators Associations of
… Petitioner
India & Others
Vs
Union of India & Another
... Respondents
BEFORE:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUHAS C. SEN,
CHAIRPERSON
MR. R.U.S. PRASAD, MEMBER MR. P.R. DASGUPTA, MEMBER
For Petitioners : Ms. Garima Dewan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. R.D.Agrawala, Senior Government Counsel with Mr. Sameer Agrawal,
Advocate
ORDER
The counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition. The prayer is allowed and the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
…………………… (SUHAS C. SEN) CHAIRPERSON
…………………… (R.U.S. PRASAD)
MEMBER
(P.R. DASGUPTA) MEMBER
193
Cellular Operators Associations of India & Others
Union of India & Another
Suhas C. Sen
R.U.S. Prasad
P.R. Dasgupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition before TDSAT in a dispute between a licensor, a licensee or a service provider under the TRAI Act.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court