In this review petition, the Supreme Court dismissed the application for oral hearing, holding that the grounds raised did not reveal any error apparent on record to warrant interfering with the earlier order that had rejected the Special Leave Petition.
The review petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
INHERENT JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL)NO.583 OF 2022
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)NO.5210 OF 2018
SAVITA AMBADAS KULKARNI …Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. …Respondents
O R D E R
Application for oral hearing is rejected.
The Special Leave Petition was rejected after hearing learned counsel for the parties. The grounds raised in the Review Petition do not make out any error apparent on record to justify interference.
This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed.
……………………………….J.
[Uday Umesh Lalit]
……………………………….J. [S. Ravindra Bhat]
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Dr. Mukesh Nasa Date: 2022.05.10 16:23:33 IST Reason:
New Delhi; 10th May, 2022.
……………………………….J. [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grounds raised in the review petition disclose any error apparent on the face of the record to justify interference with the earlier order rejecting the Special Leave Petition.
SAVITA AMBADAS KULKARNI
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Uday Umesh Lalit
S. Ravindra Bhat
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
