Sahakari Mandali Ltd. and Ors. versus Dethali Gopalak Vividh Karyakari

Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 (the Markets Act) - ss.9,10 and 11 - Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 (the Societies Act) - ss.107,108(3)(b) and 110 - Plea of appellant that members of the Managing Committees of co-operative societies (Officers of the Society) cannot participate in the election process D of Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee constituted under the Markets Act, when liquidation proceedings uls. l 07 of the Societies Act are pending against them - Held: The legislature of Gujarat by s.11 (1) of the Markets Act conferred on officers of a class of Credit Societies (dispensing agriculture credit) to have an additional function of electing melnbers of the market committees - Further, E Legislature expressly provided under the Societies Act for the curtailment of certain rights of the officers of societies facing liquidation proceeding~ - However, at the same time it also declared that such officers cease to be officers of the Society only when a final order of winding up is passed - Therefore, merely because the F officers of Credit Society facing liquidation are disabled from enforcing certain rights attached to the office, it.does not necessarily follow that they are disabled from perforn1_il}g every function entrusted by law - Debarring managing committee members from discharging their statutory obligation under the Markets Act would G be productive of public mischief - Such an interpretation of the statute must be avoided - Agriculture Produce Market Rules,] 965 - r. 7 - Co-operative Societies.

¶13

Dis,missing the appeals, the Court

¶14

HELD: 1. The. powers of the liquidator are specified under H Sectio~ VO of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961

¶15

866

¶16

VINESHKUMAR MAVJIBHAI PARMAR v. DETHALI GOPALAK VIVIDH 867 KARYAKARJ SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.

¶17

(Societies Act), the liquidator virtually becomes the caretaker manager of the society whose winding up is impending. At the same time, Sec. 108(3)(b) of the Societies Act ~tipulates that the officers of the cooperative society vacate their offices only on the passage of the final order of winding up. Obviously, they continue to be the office bearers but are disabled from enjoying certain rights attached to the office and performing certain functions to be performed by the holders of the office. [Para 21 ][875-E-F; 876-A]

¶18

The rights and functions of the OFFICERS' of a cooperative society are many. Some of them are crel!_ted by the statute under which the office is created. Others could be the creation of subordinate legislation (in the context of the present case, even the bye laws of the society). The existence or tack of such rights and functions depend upon the scheme and tenor of the SOCIETIES ACT and the subordinate legislation made thereunder. Such rights and functions are put an end to only by the operation of law i.e., the SOCIETIES ACT. [Para 22)[876-BC]

¶19

Apart from that, nothing prevents the legislature from conferring by another law ailditional rights or functions on a person holding an office created under the SOCIETIES ACT. The legislature of Gujarat by Section 11(1) of the Gujarat Agriculture Produce Markets Act, 1963 (Markets Act) conferred⁰ on the OFFICERS of a class of CREDIT SOCIETIES (dispensing agriculture credit) an additional function of electing members of the market committees. Such function is neither conferred on the OFFICERS of all the societies functioning under the SOCIETIES ACT nor such function includes the right to elect eveq.JUember of the concerned market committee. Such a function obviously _creates a right in the officers of the societies. Such a statutory right could not be taken away in the absence of any express authority of law. [Paras 23, 24][876-C-E]

¶20

The Gujarat legislature expressly provided under the SOCIETIES ACT for the curtailment of certain rights of the. officers of societies facing liquidation proceedings. At the same time it also declared that such OFFICERS cease to be the officers of the Society only when a final order of winding up is passed. In

A

B

c

D

E

F

G

H

868

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶31

[2016] 9 S.C.R.

¶32

A a given case ifthe Registrar after an appropriate enquiry following the interim order of winding decides not to finally wind up the society, the OFFICERS of ~he society would once again be entitled to exercise all the rights associated with it and perform all the functions attached to the office. Therefore, merely because the officers of CREDIT SOCIETY facing liquidation are disabled from B enforcing certain rights attached to the office or perform certain obligations appended to the office, it does not necessarily follow that they are disabled from performing every function entrusted by law to such office. [Para 25)[876-F-G; 877-A]

¶33

Credit Societies against which there is an 'interim order' c of winding up are temporarily debarred from dispensing agricultural credit, by virtue of the operation ofla~. The embargo imposed by such interim order may or may not fructify into a final order of winding up. On the face of such possibility of the society resuming its activity of "dispensing agricultural credit" - to debar D its managing committee members from discharging their statutory obligation under the MARKETS ACT would be productive of public mischief. Such an interpretation of the statute must be avoided. [Para 31][878-E-G]

¶34

MC. V.S. Arunachala Nadar v. The State of Madras and E Ors. AIR 1959 SC 300 : 1959 Suppl. SCR 92 - referred to.

¶35

Case Law Reference

¶36

1959 Suppl. SCR 92 referred to Para 13

¶37

F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3888 of2015.

¶38

From the Judgment and Order dated 17.03.2015 of the High Court of Gujarat atAhmedabad in Special Civil Application No. 3 700of2015 WITH

¶39

G

¶40

C.A. Nos. 3889, 3890, 3891, 3892, 3893, 3894 and 3896 of2015. V. Giri, Sr. Adv., Satyam Chahya, Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Ms. Dharani Subramanian, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Advs. for the Appellant.

¶41

D. N. Ray, Lokesh K. Cl~oudhary, Ms. Sumita Ray, Advs. for the H Respondents.

¶42

VlNESHKUMAR MAVJIBHAI PARMAR v. DETHALI GOPALAK VIVIDH 869 KARYAKARI SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.

¶43

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHELAMESWAR, J. 1. All these eight appeals are preferred by the unsuccessful respondents in various special civil applications (writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution) before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad disposed of by a common judgment dated 17.3.2015. 2. Whether the members of the Managing Committees of cooperative societies (against whom proceedings under Section 107 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 are pending) have a right to participate in the election process of an Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee constituted under the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963. The two enactments mentioned above are referred to hereinafter as "the SOCIETIES ACT" and "the MARKETS ACT".

A

B

c

The facts leading to the present litigation:

¶48

Sec~ 9 of the MARKETS ACT contemplates the _establishment of a "Market Committee" for every "market area". Both expressions are defined under Section 2(xiii) and 2 (xiv)'. Section 10 of the MARKETS ACT declares market committees to be bodies corporate with perpetual succession and a common seal. Section 11 stipulates that every market committee shall consist of 17 members falling into 5 categories. Section 11 (I )(i) stipulates that eight agriculturist members shall be elected by an electoral college consisting of the members of the managing committees of the "co-operative societies dispensing agricultural credit" (hereafter CREDIT SOCIETIES) in the market area.

¶49

Section 11 ( 1 )(i) of the MARKETS ACT reads as folfows: "eight agriculturists who shall be elected by members of managing committees of co-operative societies (other than co-operative marketing societies and milk produce co-operative societies) dispensing agricultural credit in the market area;"

¶50

The activity ofco-operative societies in the State of Gujarat is regulated by the SOCIETIES ACT. Section 107 of the SOCIETIES

D

E

F

G

1 Section 2 (xi ii )'·market ar_i;a" means any area declared or deemed to be declared to be a market area under this Act; Section 2(xiv) "market committee"' means a market committee established or deemed to be established under this Act;

H

r2016J 9 s.c.R.

870

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶60

A ACT provides for the liquidation and winding up of the societies functioning under the Act. Section 107(1) authorises the Registrar to pass an interim order directing a cooperative society to be wound up for any one·of the reasons specified in clauses (a), (b) and ( c) of Section 107(1 ). Sub-Section(3), thereof authorises the Registrar to pass a final order after granting a hearing to the society against which an interim

¶61

B order under sub-Section(!) is made. Such a final order could be one either finally winding up the society by confirming the interim order or vacating the interim order passed earlier, whichever is appropriate in law having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶62

In exercise of the power under Section 107 of the SOCIETIES

¶63

c ACT proceedings were initiated by the Registraf against eleven Cooperative societies (established for the purpose of dispensing agrfoultural credit) operating in the market area of a market committee known as SIRPUR market committee, the details of which are not necessary for the present purpose.

¶64

D

¶65

We are concerned with only eight of the eleven co-operative societies mentiohed above. Admittedly, with reference to each of the said eight co-operative societies, interim orders were passed initially under Section 107(1)3 of the SOCIETIES ACT directing them to be wound

¶66

'Section 2(17) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - "'Registrar" E means a person appointed io be the Registrar of Co-operative Societies under this Act; and includes to the extent of the powers of the Registrar conferred on any other person under this Act, such person and includes an Additional or Joint Registrar;

¶67

'Section 107 Winding up- (I) [Except as otherwise provided in sub-section (IA) if the Registrar, -

¶68

(a) after an inquiry has been held under section 86, or an inspection has been made

¶69

F under any of the provisions of sub-section (8) of section 84, section 87 or section 88 or on the report of the auditor auditing the accounts of the society, or]

¶70

(b) on receipt of an application made upon a resolution carried by three-fourths of the members of a society present at a special general meeting called for the purpose, or

¶71

(c) of his own motion, in the case ofa soc:ety which-

¶72

(!) has not comnienced working, or

¶73

(ii) has ceased working, or

¶74

G (iii) possesses shares of members deposits not exceeding five hundred rupees, or

¶75

(iv) has ceased to comply with any conditions as to registration and management in

¶76

this act or [the rules or the bye-laws, orj

¶77

(v) has failed to comply with any directions issued under sub-section (I) of Section 160 or such directions as modified under sub-section (2) of that section.] '

¶78

is of the opinion that a society ought to be wound up. he may make an interim order directing it to be wound up. H

¶79

VJNESHKUMAR MAVJIBHAI PARMAR v. DETHALI GOPALAK VIVIDH 871 KARYAKARI SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD. [CHELAMESWAR, J.]

¶80

up. Subsequently, final orders directing the winding up of each Onj: of the said cooperative societies were also passed. The said orders were challenged before the Appellate authority. The matters eventually reached the High Court, complete details of the litigation may not be necessary except to say rhat the High Court had set aside the final orders with a further direction to the Registrar to conduct an inquiry afresh under Section 107 of the SOCIETIES ACT and pass appropriate final orders. Admittedly the said enquiry is pending.

¶81

Elections to the SlRPUR market committee fell due in the year 2015. A voters list (under Rule 7 of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1965) came to be prepared consisting the names of the members of the managing committee of the above-mentioned 8 cooperative societies (alongwith other societies) operating within the market area of the SIRPUR market committee.

A

B

c

In view of the pendency of the liquidation proceedings, objections for the inclusion of the names of the members of the managing committees of the 8 cooperative-societies were raised. Objections were upheld by the proceedings dated 26.2.2015 of the Additional Registrar and Co-operation Officer (Market), Patan, directing the deletion of the names of the members of the managing committee of the abovementioned 8 cooperative societies~. Operative portion of the order dated 26.2.2015 w.r.t. one of the 8 societies reads;

¶86

"I, Mr. H.G. Rawal, Authorized Officer & Co-operation Officer [Market], Patan & in exercise of the powers conferred in me and as per the provisions of the Gujarat Agriculture Produce Market Committee Act, 1963 and. Market Committee Rules, 1_965 allow the application by the objector Mr. Parniar Vineshkumar Mavjibai and Prajapati Manishbai Khemabhai for deleting the names of the Managing Committee members of the Shri Kalyana Group Gopalak Vividh Karyakari Sahkari Mandali Ltd. at Kalyana, Taluka Siddhpur from the Agriculturist constituency voters list and accept the just and proper objections raised, and in the voters list Sr. 259 to 279 voters names are ordered to be deleted. The said orders will be subject to the orders passed by the Hon. High Court and Additional

¶87

' We take the facts of the first respondent society in Civil Appeal No. 3891/2015

¶88

as representative facts of the 8 appeals.

D

E

F

G

H

[2016] 9 S.C.R.

872

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶97

A Registrar[Appeal], Co-operative society, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar.

¶98

-sd-

¶99

[S.G. Rawal]

¶100

Additional Registrar &

¶101

B

¶102

Co-operation Officer [Market] Patan"

¶103

Aggrieved by such a decision, the members of the managing committee of the said society filed special civil applications invoking Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia. By the judgment impugned in these appeals, the special civil application was allowed setting aside the c orders of the Additional Registrar dated 26.2.2015.

¶104

I 0. We are informed that the facts relating to the other 7 societies are substantially similar.

¶105

ft is argued by the appellant;

¶106

D Since the 8 societies in question are in the process of being wound up, they ceased to be CREDIT SOCIETIES within the meaning of Section 11(1 )(i) of the MARKETS ACT because their activities are limited under Section 110 of the SOCIETIES ACT i.e., the business of the societies can be carried only so far as may be E necessary _for the beneficial winding up of the society. It is, therefore, submitted that the members of the managing committees of these 8 societies would be disentitled to be voters at an election for the agricultural market committee.

¶107

According to the appellants, permitting the members of the F managing committees of CREDIT SOCIETIES which are in the process of being wound up, to participate in the election process and elect agriculturist members to the market committees, would be inconsistent with the spirit of the MARKETS ACT, in view of the declaration contained in Section 108(2)5 of the SOCIETIES ACT.

¶108

G

¶109

It is, therefore, submitted that the High Court erred in interfering with the orders of the Registrar directing the deletion of the names of the members of the managing committees of the 8 societies from the voters list.

¶110

H ' See FIN 9 inji-a

¶111

VINESHKUMAR MAVJIBHAI PARMAR v. DETHALI GOPALAK VIVIDH 873 KARYAKARI SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD. [CHELAMESWAR, J.]

¶112

12.None appears for anyoneofthe respondents. 13.The purposeofthe establishmentofthe market committees was examined and explained by this Courtin_M.C.V.S.Arunacfla/a_ Nadarv.The StateofMadras&_Others,_AIR 1959SC 300.A constitution benchofthis court made an elaborate inquiry into the legislative historyofthe subject and held that: "The objectofsuch legislationisto protect the producers ofcommercial crops from being exploited by the middlemen and profiteers and to enable them to secure a fair return for their produce" (See Para 6) 14. Fo'r achieving the said purpose, market committees are constituted under the laws made by the legislaturesofvarious States giving representation considered appropriatebythe concerned legislature to various classesofpersons who have an interestinachieving the purpose ofthe market committees. 15.The legislatureofthe StateofGujarat thought it fit to give representation under the MARKETS ACT to 5 classesofpersons: (i) agriculturists, (ii) traders holding general licences⁶(iii) representatives ofthe cooperative marketing societies' (iv) anomin~tedmemberbythe concerned local authority⁸within whose jurisdiction the "principal market yard"issituatedand(v)twonominatedme.mbersofthe State Government.	A B c D E
6Section 2(ix) - "licence" means a licence granted under section 6 or, as the case may be, a general or special licence granted under section 27; 7Section2(v)-"co-operative marketing society" means a society registered or deemed to be registered as such under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act,1961(Guj. X of1962), and engagedinthe businessofbuying or selling ofagricultural produce or ofpossessing ofagricultural produce and holding a licence; 8Section2(xi)-..local authority"means- (a) a corporation constituted under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (Born. LIXof1949); or (b) a municipality constituted or deemed to be constituted under - (i) the Bombay District Municipal Act,1901(Born. Illof1901),or that Act as adapted and applied to the Saurashtra area; or (ii) the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act. 1925 (Born. XVIIIof1925). or that Act as adapted and applied to the Saurashtra area or that Act as applied to the Kutch area; or (c)a village panchayat constitutedordeemed to be constituted under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1959 (Born. Illof1959). or a gram panchayat or nagar panchayat constituted under the Gujarat PanchayatAct, 1961 (Guj.VIof1962);	F G H

12.None appears for anyoneofthe respondents.
13.The purposeofthe establishmentofthe market committees
was examined and explained by this Courtin_M.C.V.S.Arunacfla/a_
Nadarv.The StateofMadras&_Others,_AIR 1959SC 300.A
constitution benchofthis court made an elaborate inquiry into the
legislative historyofthe subject and held that:
"The objectofsuch legislationisto protect the producers
ofcommercial crops from being exploited by the middlemen
and profiteers and to enable them to secure a fair return
for their produce"
(See Para 6)
14. Fo'r achieving the said purpose, market committees are
constituted under the laws made by the legislaturesofvarious States
giving representation considered appropriatebythe concerned legislature
to various classesofpersons who have an interestinachieving the purpose
ofthe market committees.
15.The legislatureofthe StateofGujarat thought it fit to give
representation under the MARKETS ACT to 5 classesofpersons: (i)
agriculturists, (ii) traders holding general licences⁶(iii) representatives
ofthe cooperative marketing societies' (iv) anomin~tedmemberbythe
concerned local authority⁸within whose jurisdiction the "principal market
yard"issituatedand(v)twonominatedme.mbersofthe State
Government.

A
B
c
D
E

6Section 2(ix) - "licence" means a licence granted under section 6 or, as the case
may be, a general or special licence granted under section 27;
7Section2(v)-"co-operative marketing society" means a society registered or deemed
to be registered as such under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act,1961(Guj. X
of1962), and engagedinthe businessofbuying or selling ofagricultural produce or
ofpossessing ofagricultural produce and holding a licence;
8Section2(xi)-..local authority"means-
(a) a corporation constituted under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation
Act, 1949 (Born. LIXof1949); or
(b) a municipality constituted or deemed to be constituted under -
(i) the Bombay District Municipal Act,1901(Born. Illof1901),or that Act as
adapted and applied to the Saurashtra area; or
(ii) the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act. 1925 (Born. XVIIIof1925). or that
Act as adapted and applied to the Saurashtra area or that Act as applied to
the Kutch area; or
(c)a village panchayat constitutedordeemed to be constituted under the Bombay
Village Panchayats Act, 1959 (Born. Illof1959). or a gram panchayat or nagar
panchayat constituted under the Gujarat PanchayatAct, 1961 (Guj.VIof1962);

F
G
H

H

874

[2016) 9 S.C.R.

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶117

A 16. Of the above-mentioned 5 classes of members, the first three classes consist of elected members and the later two are of nominated. Three distinct electoral colleges are created under sub-clause (i), (ii) and (iii) of Section 11 (I) for electing the 3 classes of elected members.

¶118

"Section 11. Constitution of market committee -

¶119

B

¶120

(I) Every market committee shall consist of the following members namely:-

¶121

(i) eight agriculturists who shall be elected by members of managing committees of co-operative societies other than C co-operative marketing societies and milk produce cooperative societies dispensing agricultural credit in the market area;

¶122

(ii) four members to be elected in the prescribed manner from amongst themselves by the traders holding general D licenses;

¶123

(iii) two representatives of the Co-operative marketing societies situate in the market area and holding general licenses, to be elected from amongst the members (other than nominal, associate or sympathizer members) of such E societies by the members of the managing committees of such societies:

¶124

Provided that where the number of co-operative marketing societies so situate does not exceed two, only one representative shall be so elected." ~ F

¶125

While the elected representatives to the market committee belonging to classes (ii) and (iii) mentioned above are required to be members of the concerned electoral college, the Act does not insist upon such requirement w.r.t. those who are to be elected under the class (i) mentioned above. In other words, the members of the market committee G belonging to the I" of the abovementioned 5 classes need not be members of the electoral college which elects them.

¶126

H

¶127

The right to elect 'agriculturists' to a market committee is conferred under Section 11 of the MARKETS ACT upon the electoral college consisting of members of the managing committees of cooperative

¶128

VINESHKUMAR MAVJIBHAI PARMAR v. DETHALI GOPALAK VIVIDH 875 KARYAKARI SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD. [CHELAMESWAR, J.]

¶129

societies operating in the mark<;t area which are dispensing agricultural A credit (hereafter CREDIT SOCIETIES).

¶130

The reason for the above, as we understand, is that those who seek election under the category of agriculturists belong to a very nebulous class, whereas the persons falling under classes (ii) and (iii) mentioned above can be identified with certainty based upon public records. Therefore, the legislature, in its wisdom, though it fit to create an electoral college which, by virtue of its very activity, would be in a better position to identify agriculturists eligible to contest for the membership of a market committee. By the very nature of the office held by them, members of the managing committees of"cooperative societies dispensing agricultural credit" would have an opportunity to interact with the agriculturists.

¶131

The pendency of the liquidation proceedings in law⁹ , compels the elected members of the managing committee (OFFICERS of the. Society) of a co-operative society to hand over the custody and control of all the property and assets, etc. of the society to the liquidator appointed . under Section I 07( I) of the SOCIETIES ACT. According to the appellants, the necessary implication flowing therefrom is that the members of the managing committee of a society facing liquidation proceeding are debarred from anyway dealing with the affairs of their society. Therefore, they should also not be permitted to exercise the ri_ght to participate in the election of a market committee. · •

¶132

21. The powersofthe liquidator are~pecifiedunder Section11o,.
the detailsofwhich may not be necessary except to state that the liquidator virtually becomes the caretaker managerofthe society whose winding up is impending. At the same timeitis equally important to note that Sec. 108(3)(b)¹⁰stipulates that the officers ¹¹ofthe cooperative society vacate
'Seetion108. AppointmentofLiquidator- (I)When an interim or final order is made under Section 107 for the windingupofa society. the Registrar may. in accordance with the rules appoint a person to be the liquidatorofthe society, andfix his remuneration.
(2) Where an interim orderismade the officersofthesoeiet~·shall hand over to the liquidator the custody and controlofall the property, effects and actionable claims to which the societyisor appears to be entitled, andofall books, records and other documents pertainingtothe businessofthe society and, shall have no access toanyof them.
10108 (3) When a final orderismade confirming the Interim, order, the officersofthe society
xxx xxx xxx xxx
(b) shall vacate their offices and while windinguporder remainsinforce the general body ofthe society shall not exercise any powers. ·
11Section 2(14)ofthe SOCIETIESACT.- "officers" means a person elected or appointed·

B

c

D

E

F

G

H

876

[2016] 9 S.C.R.

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶143

A their offices only on the passage of the final orderofwinding up. Obviously, they continue to be the office bearers but are disabled from enjoying certain rights attached to the office and performing certain functions to be performed by the holders of the office

¶144

The rights and functions of the OFFICERS ofa co-operative

¶145

B society are many. Some of them are created by the statute under which the office is created. Others could be the creation of subordinate legislation (in the context of the present case, even the byelaws of the society). The existence or lack of such rights and functions depend upon the

¶146

·scheme and tenor of the SOCIETIES ACT and the subordinate legislation made thereunder. Such rights and functions are put an end to only by the

¶147

c operation of law i.e., the SOCIETIES ACT.

¶148

Apart from that, nothing prevents the legislature from conferring by another law additional rights or functions on a person holding an office created under the SOCIETIES ACT.

¶149

D 24. The legislature of Gujarat by Section 11 (I) of the;; MARKETS ACT conferred on the OFFICERS ofa class of CREDIT SOCIETIES an additional function of electing members of the market committees. Such function is neither conferred on the OFFICERS of all the societies functioning under the SOCIETIES ACT nor such function includes the right to elect every member of the concerned market committee. Such E a function obviously creates a right in the officers of the societies. Such a statutory right could not be taken away in the absence of any express authority oflaw.

¶150

The Gujarat legislature expressly provided under the SOCIETIES ACT for the curtailment of certain rights of the officers of F societies facing liquidation proceedings. It must be remembered that at the same time it also declared that such OFFICERS cease to be the officers of the Society only when a final order of winding up is passed. In a given case if the Registrar after an appropriate enquiry following the interim order of winding decides not to finally wind up the society, G the OFFICERS of the society would once again be entitled to exercise al I the rights associated with it and perform all the functions attached to the office. Therefore, merely because the officers of CREDIT SOCIETY by a society to any office of such society according to its bye-laws; and includes a chairman, vice-chainnan, president, vice-president, n1anaging director, n1anagcr. secretary, treasurer, member of the committee, and any other person elected or appointed under this Act, the rules or the bye-laws, to give directions in regard to the business of such H society.

¶151

.-

¶152

VINESHKUMAR MAVJIBHAI PARMAR v. DETHALI GOPALAK VIVIDH 877 KARYAKARI SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD. [CHELAMESWAR,J.]

¶153

facing liquidation are disabled from enforcing certain rights attached to the office or perform certain obligations appended to the office, it does not necessarily follow that they are disabled from performing every function entrusted by law to such office.

¶154

We now deal with the submission that the society ceased to be a CREDIT SOCIETY in view of the pendency of the winding up proceedings.

¶155

We are of the opinion that the phrase "co-operative societies di.spensing agricultural credit in the market area" in Section 11 ( 1 )(i) of the MARKETS ACT is only descriptive of the purpose for which the societies are established. Section 11 (I )(i) cannot be construed as imposing an incessant obligation of "dispensing agricultural credit" in order to enabie the members of the managing committee of CREDIT SOCIETIES to participate in the election to the market committee. The obligation, if any, to "dispense agricultural credit" arises under the byelaws of the society subject of course to the availability of funds and various othe·r factors. We are of the opinion that the above quoted words are only descriptive of the class of society the members of whose managing committees are entitled to participate in the election of the market committee. It is obvious from the language of the sub-section that there can exist more than one class of co-operative societies functioning under the Act. The very fact that the legislature took care to expressly exclude members of the managing committees_ of two classes of societies i.e. "Co-operative Marketing Societies" and "Milk Produce Co-operative Societies", definitely indicates that there can exist more than one class of societies - apart from the common knowledge.

¶156

Section 4 1 ~ of the SOCIETIES ACT contemplates that societies could be registered for different purposes. They are - "the promotion of the economic interests of its members or general welfare of its members or economic interest of the ge11eral welfare of the public".

¶157

Since Section l l(l)(i) of the MARKETS ACT is establishing an electoral college for the election of a certain class (agriculturists) of members of the market committees, the legislature thought it fit that

A

B

c

D

E

F

G

1' Section 4. Societies which may be registered.- A society, \yhich has as its object the promotion of the economic interests or general welfare of its members or of the public, in. accordance with co-operative principles, or as society established \l'ith the object of facilitating the operations of any such society, may be r~istered under this Act. ·

H

878

[2016] 9 S.C.R.

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶170

A only the members of the managing committees of those co-operative societies which have a nexus to agricultural activity should be members of the electoral college.

¶171

The submission of the appellantthat Section 11 (I )(i) imposes a legal obligation that the members of the managing committees of only B those co-operative societies which are currently dispensing agricultural credit in the market area are entitled to participate in the electoral process of the concerned market committee (in other words, the phrase "cooperative societies dispensing agricultural credit" is indicative of the current activity of the societies but not the purpose for which the society is established), would lead to various difficult questions:

¶172

c

¶173

(i) What is the period to which the currency of such activity would relate to? Whether the activity should be current when the voters' list is prepared or the activity should continue even on the date of voting?

¶174

D (ii) Whether credit societies which do not dispense agricultural credit for a certain period of time because of either paucity of funds or borrowers are debarred from "dispensing agricultural credit" because of some legal prohibition or any other reason operating temporarily cease to be societies whose objective is to provide agricultural credit?

¶175

E

¶176

Credit Societies against which there is an 'interim order' of winding up are temporarily debarred from dispensing agricultural credit, by virtue of the operation oflaw. The embargo imposed by such interim order m.ily or may not fructify into a final order of winding up. (We have already discussed this aspect of the matter at para 21 supra). On the F face ()f such possibility of the society resuming its activity of"dispensing agricultural credit" - to debar its managing committee members from discharging their statutory obligation under the MARKETS ACT would be productive of public mischief. Such an interpretation of the statute must be avoided.

¶177

G 32. For the above reasons, we do not see any merit in the appeals. Therefore, the appeals are dismissed.

¶178

Ankit Gyan

¶179

Appeals dismissed.

Sahakari Mandali Ltd. and Ors. v. Dethali Gopalak Vividh Karyakari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahakari Mandali Ltd. and Ors. v. Dethali Gopalak Vividh Karyakari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India & Anr. versus M/S Meghmani Organics Ltd. & Ors.

Syeda Rahimunnisa versus Malan Bl (Dead) by L.Rs. & Anr. etc.

Gulshera Khanam versus Aftab Ahmad

Greaves Cotton Limited versus United Machinery and Appliances.

Secretary Mahatama Gandhi Mission & Another versus Bhartiya Kamgar Sena & Others

S. Sreedhar Reddy & Ors. versus Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.