Dismissed¶33

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav v. State of Bihar Thr. CBI

Supreme Court5 Aug 20102010 INSC 483 · [2010] 9 S.C.R. 6902010 INSC 483

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail cancellation; review petition dismissed; exemption from surrendering refused; Supreme Court order dated May 03, 2010 in Criminal Appeal No. 960 of 2010 set aside bail granted on 18.02.2009 to Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav; CBI and Director General of Police, Bihar directed to execute custody order and file compliance report within four weeks; decided August 5, 2010; reported at [2010] 9 S.C.R. 690.

What did the court decide?

Having carefully gone through the review petition, the connected papers and the application for exemption from surrendering, the Court found no merit in them and dismissed the review petition and the exemption application. ¶28

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav versus State of Bihar Thr. CBI — Supreme Court (2010) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2010] 9 S.C.R. 690

¶2

¶3

RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAV

¶4

¶5

STATE OF BIHAR THR. CBI

¶6

Review Petition (Criminal) No. 352 of 2010

¶7

¶8

¶9

(Criminal Appeal No. 960 of 2010)

¶10

AUGUST 5, 2010

¶11

[MARKANDEY KAT JU AND A.K. PATNAfK, JJ.]

¶12

C Review:

¶13

Petition seeking review of the order of Supreme Court whereby it set aside the order of High Court granting bail to review petitioner - Application for exemption from surrendering also filed - HELD: It is surprising to note that 0 despite cancellation of bail of the accused by the Court, neither the accused has surren.dered nor he has been taken into custody - There is no merit in the review petition as also the application for exemption from surrendering and they are E dismissed accordingly - CBI and Director General of Police, Bihar directed to execute the order of the Court dated May 3, 2010 forthwith and send a compliance report to the Court - Bail - Cancellation of

¶14

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Review Petition F (Crl.} No. 352 of 2010.

¶15

¶16

Criminal Appeal No. 960 of 2010.

¶17

G Against the Order dated 03.05.2010 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Crl. A.No. 960 of 2010.

¶18

Prem Prakash for the Petitioner.

¶19

690

¶20

¶21

RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAV v. STATE OF 691 BIHAR THR. CBI

¶22

The following order of the Court was delivered

¶23

¶24

ORDER

¶25

This Review Petition has been filed seeking review of this Court's order dated May 03, 2010, whereby we have set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 18.02.2009 granting bail to the petitioner herein. It was directed that the petitioneraccused Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav be taken into custody forthwith.

¶26

¶27

An application for exemption from surrendering has also c been filed with this review petition. We are surprised to note that despite cancellation of bail of the accused by this Court, neither the accused has surrendered nor he has been taken into custody.

¶28

We have carefully gone through the review petition and the connected papers as also the application for exemption from surrendering. We do not find any merit therein and they are dismissed accordingly.

¶29

¶30

The CBI and Director General of Police, Bihar are directed to execute the order of this Court dated May 03, 2010 forthwith and send a compliance report to this Court within four weeks from today.

¶31

¶32

R.P.

¶33

Review Petition dismissed.

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav v. State of Bihar Thr. CBI

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav v. State of Bihar Thr. CBI

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Kumar Variar versus Share Shoppe

Rabindra Nath Singh versus Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr.

Mukesh Kishanpuria versus State of West Bengal