M/S. Prachi Industries v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh
Central Excise Act, 1944 – Section 2(f) – 'Manufacture'
Case brief
What is this about?
Supreme Court of India, Kapadia J., 28-03-2008, Civil Appeal Nos. 3621-25 of 2002 (Prachi Industries v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh): swaging of duty-paid MS tubes under Heading 73.06 held to be 'manufacture' under Section 2(f), Central Excise Act, 1944; test of distinguishable identity — change in physical shape, size and use of lasting character; same tariff entry irrelevant once manufacture established; metal forming/swaging explained via Production Technology (O.P. Khanna) and Dictionary of Technical Terms (F.S. Crispin); Bharat Forge (1990 (45) ELT 525 SC) and Hindustan Poles (2006 (4) SCC 85) distinguished; CENVAT credit and SSI exemption entitlement left open; appeals dismissed.
What did the court decide?
With the introduction of the 1985 Act, 'manufacture' under Section 2(f) includes any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product; the word 'process' must be in relation to manufacture, and an incidental process must be an integral part of manufacture resulting in a finished product of a different physical shape, size and use, imparting a change of lasting character so that a new finished product with a distinguishable identity comes into existence.