It was made clear in the said letter that the allotment was subject to conditions "Draw for specific Plot nurnber shall be held separately". Therefore, it must be inferred that no plot was E allotted to the appellant since allotment of specific plot could not be made because of failure on the part of the appellant to succeed in the draw of lots. In our view, a reading of this letter dated 1 oth of February, 1989 and also the different clauses, as already indicated in the brochure, we have no hesitation in F agreeing with the Commission that the appellant could not have acquired any legal right for allotment of a plot until and unless he could be found to be successful in the draw of lots. Therefore, in our view, it was an amount for reservation of Category-D plot, which by no means, would lead to the inference of registration G by itself guaranteeing the allotment of a specific plot to the appellant. In this connection, a decision of this Court in Saurabh Prakash VS. DLF Universal Ltd. [(2007) 1 sec 228] was cited at the ·Bar. In our view, the said decision of this Court is not applicable to the present case. In any view of the matter, in the Hpeculiar facts and circumstancesof that case, this Court also
