Charge under Section 201 IPC for causing disappearance of evidence was framed only because the accused got his car washed days after a murder. The Supreme Court held there was no evidential material even for grave suspicion and quashed the charge.
Impugned orders set aside and charge framed against the appellant under Section 201 IPC quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A
E
MOHAN SINGH
v.
f
STATE OF RAJASTHAN July 30, 1979
[R. S. SARKARIA AND V. D. TULZAPURKAR, JJ.]
JI
Penal Code, 1860 (Act 45), Section 201-Causing disappearance of eviw dence of offence to screen offender legal punishment-Absence of legal eviw dence or any material on the record of the factual ingredients of an offence under Section 201 l.P.C. entitled the discharge of the accused under Section 227 Cr/. P.C. therefore the charge framed as per Section 228 Cr/. P.C. 1973 c is illegal.
' -
On the allegations that one Padam Singh was shot dead in the farm of the appellant by Doongar Singh and two others on 4-3-1978, that the appellant'& car No. R.J.F. 2118 was made us'e of in carrying the dead body to be· thrown into a well on the boundMy of village Ramasani by Doongar Singh Who latter brought the car back on the same day to the appellant's bungalow where it D was washed the same day and thereafter the appellant got his car washed on 8-3-1978 at the Petrot Pump of one Umrwkhan, the Sessions Judge framed a charge against the appellant of an offence under Section 201, Penal Code merely on the ground that there was material to show thaJt the appellant got his car washed on 8-3-1978 at a petrol pump. The High Court refused t<> set aside the said order in revision under Section 482 Crl. P.C. 1973.
Allowing the app'eal by ipecial leave, the Court,
~--·
HELD : 1. Th'e impugned order of Sessions Judge being based on no evidential material whatever was manifestly illegal. [150A]
F
(a) The mere washing of the car on 8th March could not be printa facie evidence of the factual ingredients of an offence und'er Section 201, PenaiJ: Code. (150A] ' i
(b) lbe presence of blood stains on the car on the 8th March stood· negatived by the Prosecution's own assertion (in the Police Challan) that Doongar' Singh had got the blood on the car washed on the day of the murder~ itself, and [194G-H]
G
(c) there was nothing in the statements of the Petrol Pump de~l'er ind his servant that there was any blood on the car which was washed. There was not an iota of material on the record to furnish basis even for a grave suspicion that by getting the car washed on the 8th March, 1978, the appellant caused any blood or other evidence concerning the murder of Padam Singh te> disappear. [149F-GJ
B
C'RIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No. 363 of 1979.
(148)
MOHAN SINGH v. RAJASTHAN (Sarkaria, J.) 149
•
•Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 28~3-.1979 of the Rajasthan High Court in S.B. Cr!. Misc. Application No; 128/78 .
. A
. >
Ram Jethmalani and N. H. Hingorani for the Appellant. ·Badridas Sharma for the Respondent.
B
The Order of the Court was delivered by
f •
SARKARIA, J. This appeal by special leave is div"cted against an order, dated March 28, 1979, whereby the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the· appellant's application under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code and r~fused to set aside an Order dated August 14, 1978 of the Sessions Judge framing a charge under Section 201, Penal Code against the appellant.
The pros·"cution case as put in Court is that on March 4, 1978, one Padam Singh was shot dead at the farm of the appellant by the accused, Doongar Singh, in conspiracy with the accused, Hanif ahd Shambhoo Singh. Padam Singh's deadbody was first put in a jeep for removaL After going some distance the jeep went out of order. Thereafter, Doongar Singh brought the car of the appellant. The deadbody was then transhipped into the car (RJF 2118) and was taken to a distance and thrown into a lonely well on the boundary of village, Ramasani. Doongar Singh then brought the car back to Mohan Singh's bungalow where it was washed [ vide the Police report of A.S.P. City (West) Jodhpur]. It i~ not alleged that the appellant was in any manll'~r concerned as an abettor or accomplice in The murder or participated or abetted the removal and disposal of the deadbody of Padam Si'ngh. The only allegation on the basis of which a charge under Section 201, Indian Penal Code has been framed against the appellant is that on March 8, 1978, that is, five days ·after the murder of Padam Singh, he got his car washed at the Petrol Pump of one Umrao Khan. In this connection, the investigating Police Officer examined Sardar Kha'n sou of Umrao Khan, Petrol Pump dealer and his servant, Mangilal. There is nothing in their statements that there was any blood on the car which was washed. There was not an iota of material on the record to furnish basis even for a grave suspicion that by getting the car washed on the 8th March, 1978, the appellant caused any blood or other evidence concerning the murder of Padam Singh, to disappear. The pres·~nce of bloodstains on the car on the 8th March stood negatived by the prosecution's own assertion (in the police challan) that Doongar Singh had got the 1'lood on the car washed on th2 day of the murder, itself. The mere
c
D
E
F
G
H
150 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [ 1980 J 1 S.C.R. • ,A washing of the car on the 8th March could not, by any stretch of imagination, be prima facie evidence of the factual ingredients of .. an offence under Section 201, Pe"nal Code. The impugned order of the Sessions Judge being based on no evidential material, whatever, was manifestly illegal. We, thernfore, allow this appeal, set aside the impugned Order and quash the charge framed against the appellant. ,ti S.R. Appeal allowed.
• •
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mere washing of the appellant's car five days after a murder constituted material to frame a charge under Section 201 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohan Singh
State of Rajasthan
R. S. Sarkaria
V. D. Tulzapurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
