Dismissed

Bhagwan Kaur v. Maharaj Krishan Sharma & Ors.

Supreme Court25 Oct 19721972 INSC 262 · [1973] 2 S.C.R. 7021972 INSC 262

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's special leave appeal against the High Court's acquittal of husband and mother accused of murdering wife via acid poisoning. The Court held the High Court properly appraised evidence favoring suicide, noting medical impossibility of forcible administration, lack of injuries, and weakness in handwriting expert opinion.

What did the court decide?

The criminal appeal was dismissed; the acquittal of the two accused respondents by the High Court stands affirmed.

What the court decided

Bhagwan Kaur versus Maharaj Krishan Sharma… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Supreme Court (1973)

J02

"'·

BHAGWAN KAUR

MAHARAJ KRISHAN SHARMA & ORS.

¶7

October 25, 1972

¶8

i.H. R. KHANNA AND Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.]

¶9

Critninal trial-Appraisal of evidence in case of alleged nu1rder by .sulphuric acid poisoning-Murder or suicide-Conduct of accusedOpinion of handwriting expert providing alleged dying declaration to be in deceased's handwriting-Evidence of handwriting expert not re/iableAppeal under Art. 136, Constitution of India-This court does not re. apprise evidence except when there is some glaring infirn1iry in High Court's ji1dgn1ent resulting in n1iscarriage of justice.

¶10

The first respondent and his mother were charged with i:he murder of his wife on the allegation that they had forcibly administered sulphuric acid poison to the deceased. Immediately after finding his wife in a serious condit:on the first respondent had sent for a doctor \Vho had .advised him to take her to hospital and had also informed the police. In the hospital, according to th~ prosecution, the deceased had recovered consciousness 'for et while and had given a piece of writing P.W.l/A to her mother charging the husband with poisoning her; she had also made a similar oral statement to hr mother and another woman. A handwriting ·expert gave his opiniori that the writing in document P.W. l/A \Vas similar to the ;yJmittd \Vr!tings of the deceased. At their trial the two accused stated that the acid was not administered to the deceased but had been swallowed by herself. The Additional Sessions Judges relying on P.W.l/A held tho.~ the accused were guilty. He did not rely on the oral dying declaration of the deceased to her mother and another woman. The High Court in appeal held that the dee.eased had r.ommitted suicide. It found inherent weaknesses a:rxl improbabilities in document P.W.1 /A. Against the High Court's judgment acquitting the accused the mother of the deceased appealed to this Court. HELD : This Court in an appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution does not normally reappraise evidence unless it finds some gl2ffing infirmity in the judgment of the High Court as might have resulted in miscarriage of justice. No such infirmity was pointed out in the present case. On the contrary the High Court had properly appraised the evidence and had arrived at its conclusion in a. well~reasoned judgment.

¶11

Tue evidence of the medical expert showed that the quantity of acid which caused the injuries on the internal organs of the deceased could not have been forcihly administered. The conduct Of the occused in calling the doctor while the deceased V.'M alive was con;;istent with their innocence rather than guilt. While the accused had come out with the version of suicide at a very early stage, the complainant had come out with the allegation of murder at a very late stage.

¶12

Not much value could be attached to the evidence df. te hand\Titing expert who proved P.W.l/A. Th.e evidence of a handwntmg expert, un· like that of a fingerprint .expert ts generally of a frail character and its fallibilities have been quite often noticed. The courts shout,. therefore, be warv to give too much weight to the evidence of handwnhng expert. [7120-E]

Sri .Sri Sri Kishore Chandra SinRh Dea v. Babu Ganesh Prasad Bhagat & Ors., A.LR. 1954 S.C. 316, referred to.

¶21

BHAGWAN KAUR v. M. K. SHARMA (Kha1111a, !.) 703

¶22

A The various circumstances of the case irresistibly pointed to the conclusion that the deceased committed suicide by taking sulphuric acid. The appeal must consequently fail.

¶23

CR!MI~AL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal '."o. 235 of 1969.

¶24

H Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated January 31, J 969 of the Delhi High Court at New Delhi in Crin1inal Appeal No. 28 of 1968.

¶25

Bawa G11rcharan Singh and HarballS Singh, for the appellant.

¶26

f':lumdcli11 Ahmea and B. Dutta, for respondent No. I.

¶27

¶28

N111wldi11 ;l/m1etl and G. D. Gupta, for respondent No. ~

¶29

The hldgment of the Court was delivered by

¶30

•

¶31

·«

¶32

KHANNA, J. Maharaj Krishan Sharma (34) and his mother Shanti Devi (55) were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge Delhi under section 302 read with section 34 Indian Penal Code on the allegation that they caused the death of Shanti Devi alias Prem Lata (25), wife of Maharaj Krishan accused, by forcibly pouring sulphuric acid in her mouth, and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. On appeal the Delhi High Court acquitted the two accused by giving them the benefit of doubt. The present appeal was thereafter filed by Bhagwan Kaur, mother of Shanti Devi deceased, by >pccial leave. against the acquittal of the two accused respondents.

¶33

¶34

¶35

The prosecution case is that Shanti Devi d.:ceased was t11e daughter of PW 5 Dayal Das, Sub Inspector CID of Delhi. The deceased was married to Maharaj Krishan accused, who is a science teacher in a Delhi school, on February 20, 1963. The accused, it is stated, did not feel happy with the dowry brought by the deceased. The relations of the deceased with her husband became strained and the deceased complained of ill-treatment by the two accused. On account of the strained relations the deceased on occasions would go to her father's house and stay there for some time, but as it was she would again come back to the house of the accused. A report was also once lodged with the police by the deceased against the accused for ill-treatment. In May 1964 Maharaj Krishan accused obtained a writing from the deceased in which she stated that she wanted divorce.

¶36

¶37

¶38

Maharaj Krishan accused also ran a private college known as N. C. College at his residence in C/96, New Rajinder Nagar. New Delhi. On January 13, 1965 Hanuman Singh peon of that IO-L499Sup.C.I./73

¶39

[1973] 2 s.c.R.

¶40

SUPREME c6URT llEPORTS

¶41

704

¶42

college purchased for the college from the shop of Lajp~t Rai (PW JO) one quart of sulphuric acid with a concentrauon of 98. 9 per cent in a bottle.

¶43

Towards the end of June, Maharaj Krishan accused sent a message through the deceased to his father-in-law that he ~ted some money for going to the United Kingdom '.18 he had ~ an employment voucher from the United Kingdom. MaharaJ Krishan was, however, told by his mother-in-law Bhagwan Kaur (PW 1) that his demand for money could not be met. On July 21, 1965, it is stated, Shanti Devi deceased sent a telephonic. message to her mother Bhagwan Kaur from the house of the accused that she was being beaten by her husband. Bhagwan Kaur then went to the house of the accused. Dayal Das also reached there. Shanti Devi then told her parents while weeping that she had been beaten by her husband as he wanted money for going ·abroad. Maharaj Krishan accused then admonished the deceased and again !Jlllde a demand for money for going to the United Kingdom. Muataj Krishan was, however, told by the parents of the deceased that they could not pay him anything.

¶44

The present occurrence took place on July 23, 1965. On that day near about noon time, according to the proseculiion case, Shanti Devi accused went to the house of Sushila Devi (PW 9). The house of Sushila Devi is opposite to that of the accused. Shanti Devi accused then asked Sushila Devi to accompaay her to the house of the accused Sushila Devi went to that house after a few minutes and found the deceased lying on a carpet in the room. The deceased was crying and screaming at that time. Sushila Devi felt burning sensation below her feet when she approached near the deceased. She also felt burning sensation when she sat on· the sofa. Shanti Devi accused then abused the deceased. Sushila Devi noticed froth coming out of the mouth of the deceased. The deceased uttered twice the word "Radhaswami", which was the name of her Guru and thereafter she became unconscious. Maharaj Krishan accused was also present in the house at (hat time and was busy in making telephonic call to a doctor and asking him to come immediately to see his wife.

¶45

Dr.Tilak Raj Chadha (PW 30), homoepathic physician, is the old family doctor of the accused. According to this doctor, at about 2 p.m. on that day he received a telephonic message from Maharaj Krishan accused that there was a serious case and that the doctor must reach his (Maharaj Krishan's) house at once. Dr. Chadha was having his lunch and told Maharaj Krishan that he would come after finishing the lunch. Maharaj Krishan, however, requested Dr. Chadha not to finish the lunch but to come at once

! I

BHAGWAN KAUR ', M. K. SHARMA (Khanna, I.)

¶54

705

¶55

A as the case was very serious. Dr. Chadha, who resides at a distance of only a furlong from the house of the accused, immediately went to the house of the accused. Maharaj Krishan, who was standing at the entrance of the house, ther. told Dr. Chadha that the deceased had taken something and that Maharaj Krishan had just come from the school. Dr: Chadha ,wen~ inside and saw that B the. deceased was lying on the carpet and some salive was coming out from her mouth. Acid was found on the carpet near the head of the deceased. Dr. Chadha then told the accused to place the deceased on a cot and remove her to the hospital as the case was beyond his control. Dr. Chadha also informed the police telephonically from the house of the accused that there was a c case of acid poisoning and police should reach at once. The deceased was semi-conscious at that time and was crying. Her tongue was. charred and she could not speak. · A taxi was then brought and the deceased was put in that taxi and taken to the Willingdon Hospital. Head Constable Sita Ram (PW 29) arrived at the house of the accused when the deceased was being taken D in. the taxi to the Willingdon Hospital. Head Constable Sita Ran1 also went in the taxi along with Dr. Chadha, Maharaj Krishan accused and the deceased to the Willingdon Hospital.

On arrival in the hospital, Head Constable Sita Ram made an aj)plication to the doctor for recording. the statement of the deceased, but the doctor said that she was unfit to make a statement. ASI Hem Raj (PW 30), on coming t;o know of the telephonic message, first went to the house of the accused and, on being told that the deceased had been removed to the Willingdon Hospital, went there. The Assistant Sub Inspector met Maharaj Krishan accused in the hospital and found him to be very much upset.

¶61

At about 4.30 p.m. on that day Dayal Das (PW 5) received a telephonic message from Rajinder Nagar police station that his daughter had been admitteq in the Willingdon Hospital in a serious condition. Dayal Das: accompanied by his wife Bhagwan Kaur, then went to the hospital and found the deceased lying in the Casualty Department with serious burns over her face and chest. Maharaj Krishan accused was also present at that time outside the hospital. Keshava Nand, who is cousin of Bhagwan Kaur and his wife Kamla (PW 2) also reached the hospital. At about 1 i. p.m. on that night Shanti Devi deceased was removed to the female ward. Bhagwan Kaur went with the deceased to the ward. Kamla sat in the verandah of that ward.

¶62

¶63

At about mid-night hour, it is alleged, Shanti Devi deceased regained consciousness and opened her· eyes. Bhagwan Kaur asked the deceased as to what had happened, but the deceased could

¶64

[1973] 2 s.c.R.

¶65

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶66

;06

¶67

not speak and made a gesture indicating that she would like to write something. Bhagwan Kaur then went to the doctor's room and found nobody present there. Bhagwan Kaur picked up a piece of paper which was lying on the floor of that room. She also picked up a pen lying on the table. Bhagwan Kaur on return supported the deceased by sitting by her side and the dece:ised started writing on the paper. Bhagwan Kaur put a spit-pan upside down under the paper with a view to support it. After writing something the deceased shook the pen indicating that there was no more ink in it. Bhagwan Kaur then brought another pen from the table in the doctor's room and with that pen, the deceased wrote something more. After the deceased had completed the writing, Bhagwan Kaur took the pen back to the doctor's room and placed it on the table. The writing of the deceased is PW 1 /A and is in Hindi. It was signed in Hindi by the deceased as Shanti Devi. The deceased also appended her signature on it in English. The writing was to the following effect :

¶68

"I am in senses now. A quarrel took place at my house yesterday and my husband asked me that he had no connections with me and that I should go to my parents. I did not go. Thereupon my (husband) cauglit hold of my hand forcibly and my mother-in-law put some drug in my mouth forcibly with her .hands, some of which got into (my mouth) and some scattered ~t the ground.

(

(}

Written by: Shani Shan11a

¶74

(Shan ti Sharma Maharaj) Shanti Devi Shanna C/o. Maharaj Krishan Sharma. "(Husband Name)"

¶75

Bhagwan Kaur, according to the prosecution case, is ill.'l!rate ;1nd could ng_t.read what had been written by Shanti Devi deceased. When Bhagwan Kaur insisted upon the d'ceased speaking something, the deceased told Bhagwan Kaur that the two accused .had put acid on her tongue. Bhagwan Kaur then_ started weeping whereupon Kamla came ·inside. Kamla too was told by Shanti Devi deceased that she had been forcibly given something in her mouth and that >he had given a writing to her mother. Soon thereafter Bhagwan Kaur became unconscious and regained consciousness at 5 a.m.

¶76

The condition of Shanti Devi deceased deteriorated in the morni ug, a1id she died at about 10.45 a.m.

ASI Hem Raj first rrepared inque'1 reoort PW 51 J in the presence of the.two accused. In the aforesaid inquest report, the

¶81

BHAGWAN KAUR v. M. K. SHARMA (Khan1111, I.)

¶82

.107

¶83

Assistant Sub lnspector recorded the statements of the two accused. Maharaj Krishan accused, in the course of his statement in the inquest report, stated that there used to take place petty quarrels between him and his wife, who had not given birth to any child, but the matter used to be patched up. On July 23, .1965, accordII ing to Maharaj Krishan, he told the deceased at the tjme he was taking meals about his proposed visit to England. Shanti Devi accused was also present at that time. The deceased then tried to dissuade Maharaj Krishan from going to England but he advised her to complete her studies and pass B.A.B. T. examination during the period he remained abroad. Shanti Devi accused then went out. .Maharaj Krishan also went towards the kitchen to leave the utensils there. Maharaj Krishan then heard cries of the deceased. · Both he and his mother rushed to the spot where the deceased was present. The deceased then pointed towards .a bottle containing acid lying in the almirah and told the accused that she had taken acid out of that. Maharaj Krishan also noticed some stains of acid scattered in the room. Maharaj Krishan immediately rang up Dr. I> Chadha. The doctor sent a report to the police station with the consent of Maharaj Krishun. The deceased was then taken to Willingdon Hospital. To similar effect was the statement of Shanti Devi accused.

¶84

According to ASI Hem Raj, at about 2.45 p.m. Bhagwan Kaur made a statement PW I /B to him. In the course of that 'tatement Bhagwan Kaur referred to the previous strained relations of the accused with the deceased. Bhagwan Kaur also made reference to the writing of dying declaration PW 1 /A by the deceased during the night as well as to the oral statement of the deceased to Bhagwan Kaur. Bhagwan Kaur at the same time F handed over dying declaration PW 1/ A to ASI Hem Raj. The Assistant Sub Inspector 'then prepared another inquest report PW 5/D in which he recorded th.: statements of Bhagwan Kaur and Dayal Das. A case was registered on the basis of statement PW l/B of Bhagwan Kaur at police station Rajinder Nagar at 3.25 p.m.

¶85

¶86

¶87

Post mortem examin~tion on the hody of Shanti Devi .deceased was performed by Dr. R. L. Handa at 2.30 p.m. on July 25, 1965. The doctor expressed the opinion that the death of the deceased was due to corrosive poisoning probably by ·acid. He also expressed the view that the acid of that much quantity could not be forced into the stomach by somebody else. The case was thereafter investigated by ASI Hem Raj (PW 33) and Inspector Jagdish Kumar (PW 35). Writing PW l /A was sent to Dr. S. K. Sharma. Government Examiner of Questioned Documents. Dr. Sharma

¶88

[1973J 2 s.c.R.

¶89

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶90

708

¶91

expressed the opinion that there was similarity in writing PW 1 I A and other documents containing .the admitted writing of Shanti Devi deceased.

¶92

On February 17, 1966 the police submitted a report to the magistrate that the case should be cancelled as the evidence indicated that the death. of the deceased was the result of suicide. Shri J agmohan magistrate then passed an order in accordance with th.it report. On June I, 1966 Bhagwan Kaur filed a complaint against the accused under section 302 read with section 34 Indian l'enal Code on the above allegations.

¶93

At the trial the two accused, while not denying the strained relations with the deceased, stated that the deceased had died because she had herself swallowed sulphuric acid. According to the accused, the sulphuric acid was not administered to her. No evidence was produced in defence.

¶94

Lcan>.cd Additional Sessions Judge held that the death of Shanti Devi deceased was caused by the accused in the manner slated by her in dying declaration PW!/ A. Evidence about the oral dying declaration of Shanti Devi deceased io Bhagwan Kaur and Karnla was not accepted.

¶95

On appeal the learned judges of the High Court referred to the different cirrnmstances of the case and found that those cirl:Umstanccs pointed to the conclusion that the deceased had died as a result of suicide. As regards !Jie dying declaration PW 1 /A, the learned judges took the view that there were inherent weaknesses and improbabilities which fumished intrinsic evidence i•gainst the acceptance of the dying declaration. Those weaknesses were enumerated as under :-

¶96

.. (I) lt s1arts with the words "At this time I am in senses." It is rather unusual that a person in that condition would extend that type of assurance or declaration which appears to be an effort to leml ~ wlour of genuineness.

¶97

( 2) The details about her husband having asked her to go to her parents also brings in an element of doubt because nonnallv a person in that condition will avoid details.

¶98

(J) The letter contains the word "Lekha.k", which means "the writer". The signatures in Hindi are not complete as it is only signed as 'Shani Sharma'. Against the Hindi signatures there is bracket and then she is alleged to have signed in English 'Shanti Shanna Maharaj'. Again at

BHAUWAN KAUR v. M. K. SHARMA (Khanna, I.)

709

the back of the Jetter she has signed in English as 'Shanti Devi Shanna C/ o Maharaj Krishan Sharma (Husband Name). The last of the above mentioned writing shows the meticulous care with which the identity of the husband is sought to be established. I find itdifficult to accept that a patient in that agony would add the words such as 'the writer', repeat her signatures in English, and the word 'Maharaj' ,als0 which is not found in any of her admitted letters such as Exhibits PW 5/C. P.W. and P.W. 51F and write what is written at the back of the paper.

¶113

(4) The writing in the letter is in a finn hand which is inconsistent with the writing of a person in Shanti Devi's condition.

¶114

(5) The incomplete signatures as 'Shani Sruirma' cast a doubt in my mind because a person who could write so much would not have normally made a mistake in putting down complete Hindi signat;ures." . ·

¶115

We have heard in this Court Mr. Churcharan Singh on behalf of the appellant and Mr. Nooridin on behalf of the respondents and are of the opinion that the present appeal is devoid of any merit.

¶116

¶117

It is the common case of the parties and is proved by the evidence of Dr. Handa that Shanti Devi deceased died due to corrosive acid poisoning. Dr. Handa, who arrived at ~his conclusion, found at the time of post mortem examination that both the lips of the deceased showed acid burns. Two streaks of acid, each , 2'' long and one 1/3" br<iad, were found present on either side of the chin. Small acid burns were present on the forehead, left cheek and chest. On internal examination, the doctor found that the inner aspect of the lips, the lining of the oral cavity and tongue were corroded. The teeth were chalky whlte. F<>od pipe showed corrosion of mucus. Stomach was charred black and corroded. It G had three perforations and the acid was found to hav\l gone to the peritoneal cavity, leaving burns on the surface of the liver and adjacent structures. Stomach wall was friable and was empty. Duodenum was also partly corroded. Reaction of the bums was strongly acidic. The quall'lity of acid poored into the mouth, in the opinion of the doctor, might be between half an ounce to one H ounce.

¶118

¶119

According to the prosecution case, it were the accused who forcibly poured acid into the mouth of the deceased. As against

(1973] 2 S.C.R.

710

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

¶124

¶125

that tho defence version was to tho effect that the deceased commit~ suicide by drinking acid. The High Court on appreciation of tile evidence came to the conclusion that the various circwnstances of the case pointed to the inference that the death of the deceased was the result of suicide. This Court in an appeal under article 136 of the Constitution does not no!11lally reappraise evidence unless it finds some glaring infirmity in the judgment of the High Court as might have resulted in miscarriage of justice. No such infirmity has been brought to our notice. On the contrary, we find that the High Court has properly appraised the evidence and has arrived at its conclusion in a well-reasoned judgment

¶126

N:> eye "itness of the occurrence has been produced by the prosecntion because, according to it, no one else was present at the time the acid was forcibly poured into the mouth of the deceased. To bring the charge home to the accused, the prosecution has however, relied upon the dying declaration PW 1/ A alleged to have been written by the deceased at about mid-night hour in the female ward of Willingdon Hospital after the deceased had regained consciousness. The prosecution has further relied upon the oral dying declaration said to have been made by the deceased at first to her mother Bhagwan Kaur PW and thereafter to Kamla PW in the female ward of the hospital during the night. The evidence about the oral dying declaration was rejected by both the trial court as well as the High Court. Regarding the ·written dying declaration, the trial court accepted the prosecution '!-Vidence, but the High Court found the same to be full of infirmities and im probabiliiies, which have already been enumerated earlier. Nothing cogent has been brought to our notice to take a view different from the High Court.

¶127

Apart from the infinnities and improbabilities pointed out by the High Court, we find that· the salient features of the evidence all point to the conclusion that the death of the deceased was the. result of suicide and was not homicidal. We may now refer to thos~ features .

r' ·'

)

. According to· Dr. Handa, who perfonned post mortem exami· nation on the boe J of the deceased, the quantity. of acid which was found in the stomach of the deceased was so much that it could not be p0ured by someone else. The doctor added thatth..: cases of homicidn~ a~ministrati?n of sulphuric acid by force were ~ery. rare. If the ~1ct1m, accordmg to Dr. Randa, is overpowered forcibly and a third person pours acid mechanically by pulling the tongue out, the acid can reach the stomach but not to the e::tent so as to reach the stomach and beyond, as was the cas.o with the deceased. The acid poured into the mouth of the deceased

BHAGWAN KAUR v. M. K. SHARMA (Khanna, I.) . 7 11

¶139

A Was not less than half an ounce. The doctpr also did not find any marks of injuries on the body of the deceased other than the bums. If the deceased had been held forcibly by one of the accused and the other accused had poured acid into her mouth, the dece.ased, in. our opinion, must have offered some resistance. In such an event, some injuries in the nature of abrasions or scratches

¶140

H must have been found on the body of the deceased. The evidence of Dr. Handa shows that no such injuries were found on the body. The material on the record also indicates tha~ ·no such injuries were found on the person of the accused. The medical evidence thus belies the prosecution version of the occurrence.

¶141

c The opinion of Dr. Handa that it was a case of suicide and not homicide is in consonance with the views expressed in standard books on medical jurisprudence. In Taylor's Principles and Practice of Medical Jurisprudence, Twelfth Edition, at page 235 it is said that sulphuric acid is used for suicidal purposes and accidents occur· as a result of it having been mistaken for some other liquid. Accor<ling to Modi's Medical Jurisprudence and Tonco-

¶142

D logy, Fifteenth Edition, page 481, acid may be taken for suicidal purposes. It is further stated :

¶143

¶144

"Owing to its acid taste and physical changes brought purooses. unless the victim happens to be a child or an about in the food it is not possible to use it for homicidal adult who is drunk or helpless."

¶145

Acording to observatios on page 709 of ~onz~~es Lega! Me?icine Pathology and Toxicology, Second Edition, Sulphunc acid, due to its severe corrosive action, has rarely been given by mouth for homicidal purposes except to children. It is sometimes thrown on a person to disfigure the face, and it may cause death from the F severe burns inflicted on the skin. Most of the cases are• suicidal, due to the ingestion of the acid. Some cases are accidental, the acid having been ingested in mistake for a medicine, or mixed with food, or poured into the ear, or injected into the ractum by error instead of a therapeutic drug, or injected into the vagina fo1· the purpose of causing abortion."

¶146

G The conduct of the accused immediately after the occurrence is consistent with the hypothesis of their innocence rather than with that of L'Jeir guilt. It is inconceivable that Shanti Devi accused would have called her neighbour Sushila Devi PW IQ her house if Shanti Devi accused along with the other accused shortly before that had forcibly poured acid into the mouth of !he deceased. If H is also most unFkely that Maharaj Krishan accuSed would have made frantic telephonic calls to Dr. Chadha to immediately rusl1 to his house if Maharaj Krishan along with his mother had poured

¶147

[1973] 2 S.C.Jl,

¶148

SUP!lBME COURT llBPOllTS

¶149

712

¶150

acid into the mouth of the deceased. It 1s . filrther '" extremely improbable in that event that Maharaj Krishan would have allowed Dr. Chadha to use Maharaj Krishan's telephone to call the police. Maharaj Krishan would also in that event have not taken the deceased to the hospital. On the contrary, Maharaj Krishan would have, ·if he. and his mother had been the real culprits, waited for the time till the deceased died rather than taken the risk of the deceased regaining consciousness in the hospital and making a dying declaration regarding their complicity .

¶151

. So far as the dying declaration PW 1/ A is ·concerned, we are of the opinion that the evidence about the writing of that docu · ment by the deceased is of a most unconvinc;:ing character. The High Court has referred to a number of circumstances which militate against the acceptance of the evidence regarding the aforesaid dying declaration, and we find no cogent ground to take a different. view. It is no doubt true that the prosecution led evidence of handwriting expert to sh.:iw the similarity of handwrit· ing between PW 1/ A and other admitted writings of the deceased, but in this respect, we are of the opinion that in view of the main essential features of the case, not much value can be attached to the expert evidence. The evidence of a handwriting expert, unlike that of a fingerprint expert, is generally of a frail character and its fallibilities have been quite often noticed. The courts should, therefore, ~ wary to give too much weight to the evidence oi handwriting expert. In Sri Sri Kishore Chandra Singh Deo v. Babu Ganesh Prasad Bhagat & Ors. (1). this Court observed that conclusions based upon mere comparison of handwriting must at best be indecisive · and yield to the positive evidence in the case.

¶152

According to Bhagwan Kaur, Shanti Devi deceased wrote the dying declaration soon after mid-night hour. Question then arises a!f to why Bhagwan Kaur did not immediately go out of the female ward and tell her husband Dayal Das that the deceased had been forcibly administered sulphuric acid by the accused. Bhagwan Ka.ur has tried to explain this omission by saying that she was illiterate and did not know about the contents of writing PW 1/ A Bhagwan ](aur, however, admits that, soon after the deceased had written dying declaration PW 1/ A, the deceased told Bhagwan Kaur that th~ two accused had forcibly poured sulphuric acid into her mouth. It cannot, therefore, be said that Bhagwan Kaur remained unaware after 1 or 2 a.m. on the night between July 23 and 24 that it were the accused who had poured acid into the mouth of the deceased. The inunediate reaction of Bhagwan Kaur. if the prosecution story were correct, would have been to go out and

(I) A. L R. 1'54 S. C. 316.

¶161

BHAGWAN KAUR v. M. K. SHARMA (Khanna, I.)

¶162

713

¶163

A apprise her husband, who is a police Sub Inspector, so that the.latter· might inform the police regarding the complicity of the two accused. Bhagwan Kaur has tried to explain this omission by stating that she became unconscious. There is, however, no explanation as to why Kam la, who too professes to have been told by the \leceased regarding the forcible administering of acid to the deceased, kept quiet B and did not convey that information to Dayal Das. It is further admitted by Bhagwai1 Kaur that she regained her consciousness at 5 a.m. If Bhagwan Kaur had been handed over a dying declaration by the deceased and had also been told by the deceased regarding the .forcible administering of acid to her by the accused, Bhagwan Kaur in that event could not have failed to convey that information c to Dayal Das soon after regaining consciousness. Dayal Das in that event would .have immediately reported the matter to the police. The fact that no such intimation was given to the police till 2.45 p.m., as deposed by ASI Hem Raj, creates considerable doubt regarding the authenticity of dying declaration PW I/ A as well as about .the testimony of Bhagwan Kaur and Kamla regarding D the oral dying declaration of Shanti Devi deceased.

¶164

Another significant circumstance which emerges from the evidence on record is that Maharaj Krishan came out with the version of suicide at the earliest stage. According to Dr. Chadha, he was told by Maharaj Krishan immediately on arrival of Dr. Chadha that the deceased had taken something. Maharaj Krishan E and his mother also gave account of suicide by the deceased in their statements recorded in the inquest report PW 5/J. As against that, the evidence of ASI Hem Raj shows that Bhagwan Kaur came· out with the story of dying declaration at a subsequent stage.

¶165

In our opinion, the various circumstances of the care irresistibly F poit to the c?nclujon that the deceased committed suicide by ta~mg sulphunc acid. The appeal consequently fails and is dismissed.

¶166

G.C.

¶167

Appeal dismissed.

Bhagwan Kaur v. Maharaj Krishan Sharma & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Bhagwan Kaur v. Maharaj Krishan Sharma & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rameshchandra J. Thakkar versus a. P. Jhaveri & Anr.

Abdus Sukkur versus the State of West Bengal

P. D. Jambekar versus State of Gujarat

The Management of Oriental Mercantile Agency versus the Presiding Officer & Ors.

Pandharinath Shridhar Rangnekar versus Dy. Commr. of Police, the State of Maharashtra