There is no doubt that the dispute between the respondent Bank and the appellant fell within s. 5S and was properly referred to arbitrartion under that section. It is however, contended that the appellant was registered in D:cember 195S under the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1955, and by virtue of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, and s. SA of the Multi-Unit Co-operative Societies Act, 1942, the appellant has ceased to be governed by the provisions of the Punjab Co-operative Societies Act because it has become a multi-unit co-operative society. There is no doubt that by virtue of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, and s. SA of the Multi-Unit Co-operative Societies, Act, 1942, the appellant has become a multi-unit co-operative society and the Multi-Unit Co-operative Societies Act applies to it. But that Act is for the incorporation, regulation and winding up of co-operative societies with objects not confined to one State, and it has no impact on s. SS of the Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, 1961, inasmuch as the appellant remains a member of the co-operative society, namely, the respondent Bank. There is nothing in the provisions of the Multi-Unit Co-operative Societies Act to indicate that a multi-unit co-operative society cannot be a member of a co-operative society governed by the Punjab Act of 1961. If the appellant continues to be a member, then the terms of s. 55 apply and a dispute can be referred to arbitration under that section. An appeal against that award lies under s. 68 of the Punjab Act of
