(ii) refusng to renew a certificate of approval, prospecting license or mining lease; (iii) cancelling a prospecting license or mining lease; (iv) refusing to permit transfer of a prospecting license or any right, title or interest t]¥rein under clause (iv) of sub-rule (l) of rule 23 or a mining lease or any right, title or interest therein under rule 37, it shall communicate in writing the reasons for such order to the person against whom the order is passed and any person aggrieved by such order may, within two months of the date of receipt of such order, apply to the Central Government for reviewing the same. (2) Where a State Gover 1 nment has failed to dispcse of an application for the grant or renewal of a certificate of approval or prospecting license or a mining lease within the period prescribed there.for in these Rules, sm:b failure shall, for the purpose of these rules, be deemed to b a refusal to grant or renew such certificate, license or lense, as the case may be, and any person aggrieved by rnch failure may, within two months of the expiry of the period aforesaid apply to the Ce,ntral Government fo~ reviewing the case. ( 3) An application for review under this rule may be admitted after the period of !imitation prescribed under this rule, if the applicant satisfies the Central Government that he had· sufficient cause for not making the application within the said period." A further amendment to that rule 57 (2) was made on August 31, 1957. The concerned notification No. S.R.O. 2753 reads : "In exercise of the powers conferred by section 5 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendmemt in the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, namelyProvided that any such application pending with the State Government on the 14th September, 1956, and remaining undisposed of on the 24th August, 1957, shall be disposed of by the State Governmeint within six months from the latter date.'l.