and purchase of land as its substantial business. By a sale deed executed on November 24, 1944 the company purchased 646 kama!s, 9 marlas of land from Harjit Singh for a sum of Rs. 32,326/-. The land was located in village Monanpura of District Sheikupura, now in West Pakistan. Out of the consideration for the sale, a sum of Rs. 9,000/- was left with the company B for payment to the previous mortgagees and the balance of the money was paid to Harjit Singh before the Sub-Registrar at the time of registration. On the basis of the registered sale deed the company was allotted 27 standard acres and 11 t units of land in village Bohani, Tehsil Phagwara District Kapurthala in the year 1950 in lieu of the land abandoned in Pakistan. A sanad no. c K2/ 4/8 dated March 9, 1950 was issued in favour of the company. There was consolidation of holdings in village Bohani and as a result of consolidation the area allotted to the company came to 23 kanals and 5 marlas. Out of this the company sold 9t kanals to Mohan Singh, a Jat of village Bohani for Rs. 1900.00 by registered sale deed dated May 22, 1956. Another portion of D 220 kanals and 15 marlas was sold on September 12, 1958 for Rs. I 0,012/- to one Mehnga Singh and his sons. It was later discovered that the company had been allotted less area of land than it was entitled to as a result of consolidation operations and so an additional area of 24 kanals was allotted to the company in village Bohani to make up the deficiency. On August 30, 1960 the Managing Officer, respondent no. 3, made a report, Annexure E C, to the Chief Settlement Commissioner, Respondent no. 2 recommending cancellati;m of the allotment of land to the company and consequently the grant of permanent rights to :1. The company was heard by the Chief Settlement Commissioner and thereafter the Chief Settlement Commissioner rejected the registered sale deed and balance sheets and relying on the jamabandi, anneF xure X, came to the conclusion that at the time of partition the company did not own any land in Pakistan nor was it in occupation of any such land. By his order dated February 27, 1961 respondent no. 2 set aside the permanent rights acquired by the company to the extent of 27 standard acres, 11 t units and also · cancelled the quasi-permanent allotment of the land made in the G name of the company. On March 29, 1961 a revision petition was filed by the company to the Central Government, respondent no. 1. But the revisic.n petition was dismissed on May 10, 1961. On June 8, 1961 the company filed a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution praying for grant of a writ to quash the order of the Chief Settlement Commissioner dated February 27, 1961. The writ petition was allowed by Sharnshar Bahadur, J. But the H respondent took the matter in appeal under cl. 10 of Letters Patent to a Division Bench which reversed the judgment of the learned single Judge and ordered the writ petition to be dismissed.
