These provisions show clearly that the legislature has used the word "trees" at three places in three different contexts, in secs. 4(a), 5(b) and 5(c) apart from the expression "all groves wherever situate" in sub-cl. (iv) of sec. 5(b). Whereas under sec. 4(a) the trees are to vest in the State Government along with the forests, fisher- C ies etc., the trees mentioned in sec. 5(b)(iii) and (c) are aUowed to continue to belong to and be held by the jagirdar. Obviously, the word "trees" in these provisions has not been used in any uniform sense and therefore has to be construed in the context in which it is used. For instance, the word 'trees' in sec: 5(b)(iii) and (c) is placed in juxtaposition with other properties such as private D buildin~. places of worship, wells situated in lands included in the said enclosures and house sites referred to in sub-els. (i) and (ii). It appears that the policy of the legislature was that jagir lands including forests, trees in such forests, fisheries, wells, tanks, ponds, ferries, pathways, village sites etc., which were used by: the public aind in which the members of the public were interested were re- E sumed while the land in personal cultivation of the jagirdar, enclosures used for agricultural and domestic purposes, house sites purchased for valuable consideration, private buildings, places of worship, wells, trees standing on lands in such enclosures and house sites and tanks, trees, private wells and buildings in or on occupied land belonging to or held by the jagirdar were allowed l to continue to belong to and be held by him. It will be seen that groves in sub-cl.. (iv) of sec. (b) are included amongst properties allowed to continue to belong to and be held by the jagirdar. Subclause (iv) also shows that such groves need not be of fruit trees nor need the trees thereof have been planted by the jagirdar. The words "wherever situate" indicate that it is not necessary that they G should be on lands or properties allowed to be retained by the jaigirdar under s. 5. If a grove belonged to or was held by him, whether planted by him or of natural growth and wherever situate it is allowed to continue to belong to him and be held by him. the intention of the legislature appears therefore to be that properties which the jagirdar was in personal use and possession of or in respect of which he had paid valuable consideration are to be H retaim'd by him. It is in this context that we should construe subcl. (iv) of sec. 5(b). A grove irrespective of where it is situate, but belonting to or held by the jagirdar is to continue to belong to or to te held by him. To secure the full and proper use and enjoyment of such a grove, if it is on land other than that which is
