Dismissed

Bhinv Singh S/O Shri Banne Singh v. Secretary, Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinates and Ministerial Service)

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2026WRW/49/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Anand Sharma dismissed the review petition filed by Bhinv Singh. The court found no error in the previous order dismissing the writ petition due to the petitioner's failure to meet qualification and experience requirements under the Rajasthan Town Planning Service Rules, 1966.

What did the court decide?

Review petition dismissed; impugned order dated 21.04.2025 affirmed; pending applications disposed of.

Bhinv Singh S/O Shri Banne Singh Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:35227]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 49/2026 CNR: RJHC020120712026 | URN: WRW / 135U / 2026

¶4

¶5

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13608/2016

¶6

Bhinv Singh S/o Shri Banne Singh, aged about 42 years, R/o Village Post Sujanpura, Via Signrawah, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

Secretary, Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinates & Ministerial Service), Selection Commission, G-3, Rajmahal Residency, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur.

¶10

Secretary, Local Self Government, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶11

Director & Joint Secreatry, Local Self Government, G-3, Rajmahal Residency, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur. --Non-Appellants/Respondents

¶12

Mahendra Nath S/o Shri Gopal Nath, aged about 31 years, R/o Shrinath Sadan, 835/13, Opposite HMT Factory, Near New Masjid, Azad Nagar, Ajmer.

¶13

Manish Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ram Niwas Meena, aged about 27 Years, R/o House No. 221/12, New Chandra Nagar, Beawar Road, Ajmer.

¶14

----Performa Non-Appellants/Petitioners

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal For Respondent(s) :

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

¶17

Order

¶18

01/09/2026

¶19

Heard on S.B. Review Petition No.49/2026 filed by the petitioner for seeking review of order dated 21.04.2025 passed by this Court whereby writ petition filed by the petitioner was

¶20

[2026:RJ-JP:35227]

¶21

[WRW-49/2026]

¶22

dismissed. This Court has perused order dated 21.04.2025 wherein after considering the fact that the petitioner did not possess the qualification as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Town Planning Service Rules, 1966, (for short the 'Rules of 1966') the writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. It has been specifically recorded in order dated 21.04.2025 that the petitioner has utterly failed to show that he is possessing any experience as required under the Rules of 1966.

¶23

In view of above, this Court does not find any error apparent in order dated 21.04.2025 therefore, the review petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed.

¶24

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶25

(ANAND SHARMA),J

¶26

61/NEERU

Bhinv Singh S/O Shri Banne Singh v. Secretary, Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinates and Ministerial Service)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhinv Singh S/O Shri Banne Singh v. Secretary, Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinates and Ministerial Service)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases