Allowed¶18

Purushottam Meena S/O Late Shri Moolchand Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Feb 2026WRES/35/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 35/2026 (WRES-35/2026); Justice Ashok Kumar Jain; order dated 09/02/2026. Petitioner Purushottam Meena (PWD, Jaipur) versus State of Rajasthan and PWD officers. Writ petition SB CWP No.19164/2019 dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.01.2026; restoration allowed on reasons assigned by counsel; petition restored and to be re-listed after two weeks. Keywords: restoration of writ petition, dismissal for non-prosecution, PWD employee, Rajasthan High Court.

What did the court decide?

Restoration application allowed; writ petition No.19164/2019 (previously dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.01.2026) restored to the Board; office directed to re-register the petition and list after two weeks; misc. application stands disposed of. ¶18

Purushottam Meena S/O Late Shri Moolchand Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:5894]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 35/2026

¶4

Purushottam Meena S/o Late Shri Moolchand Meena, Aged About 56 Years, Village Harsuliya, Tehsil Faggi, District Jaipur, At Present Posted In The Office Of Assistant Engineer, Pwd Sub Division Faggi, District Jaipur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, P.w.d. Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Chief Engineer Cum Additional Secretary, P.w.d. Jacob Road, Main Building, Pwd, Jaipur.

¶9

Additional Chief Engineer, Zone- Second, Pwd, Jacob Road, Jaipur.

¶10

The Executive Engineer, Pwd, Chaksu Division, Pwd, Jaipur.

¶11

The Assistant Engineer, Sub Division, Pwd, Faggi, Jaipur.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Imran Khan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	DheerajTripathi,AGC

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

¶15

Order

¶16

09/02/2026

¶17

Considered submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent non-applicant.

¶18

SB CWP No.19164/2019 was dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.01.2026 and the counsel has assigned the reasons in the application itself, hence the application is allowed and the writ petition No.19164/2019 is restored to the Board.

¶19

Office is directed to re-register the writ petition and list after two weeks.

[2026:RJ-JP:5894]

[WRES-35/2026]

(2 of 2)

Misc. application stands disposed of.

¶24

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J