Allowed

Smt. Babli W/O Late Ramcharan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Jul 2026SOSA/363/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Convicted applicant serving life imprisonment for murder sought suspension of sentence pending appeal. Considering she is a lady with two children and the appeal may take long to be heard, the court allowed the application, suspended execution of sentence and admitted her to bail.

What did the court decide?

Execution of life sentence suspended during pendency of appeal; applicant admitted to bail on trial court's satisfaction, with appearance before this Court on 04.08.2026 and thereafter as directed.

Smt. Babli W/O Late Ramcharan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24570-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No.

¶4

363/2026

¶5

URN: SOSA / 746U / 2026

¶6

in D. B. Criminal Appeal No. 84/2026

¶7

Smt. Babli W/o Late Ramcharan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Kalwadi, P.s. Kherli, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶8

----Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mohar Pal Meena, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Additional Government Advocate
	assisted by Ms. Neha Goyal,
	Advocate.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order

¶14

02/07/2026

¶15

This suspension of sentence application has been filed by

¶16

the accused-applicant along with the appeal.

¶17

Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.

¶18

Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the

¶19

certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules

¶20

[2026:RJ-JP:24570-DB]

¶21

[SOSA-363/2026]

¶22

(2 of 3)

¶23

to the effect that accused-applicant is in judicial custody. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant is a lady having two children and she was on bail during trial. Counsel further submits that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future. Therefore, he prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal.

¶24

Learned Additional Advocate General opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

¶25

We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶26

Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the fact that the accused-applicant is a lady having two children and also considering the fact that hearing/disposal of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application.

¶27

In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicant shall appear before this Court on 04.08.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶28

[2026:RJ-JP:24570-DB]

¶29

[SOSA-363/2026]

¶30

(3 of 3)

¶31

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the

¶32

concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.

¶33

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶34

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶35

28/TUSHAR/741

Smt. Babli W/O Late Ramcharan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Babli W/O Late Ramcharan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashvad Ali Son of Abdul Sattar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Raish S/O Late Shri Bashir Khan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sajid Urf Gugga S/O Juharu Vs State of Rajasthan

Asha Devi, W/O Satish Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kaushlendra Prapannacharya Alias Falhari Maharaj S/O Madhusudnacharya Vs State of Rajasthan

Pirumal Vaishnav, Son of Late Shri Kanadas Vs State of Rajasthan