Allowed

Ramswaroop S/O Shri Gullaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Mar 2026SOSA/255/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspension of sentence application against conviction and twenty-year sentence under the POCSO Act in a Jaipur District sessions case. Considering the record, period of custody since January 2022 and likelihood of delay in appeal disposal, the court admitted the application and released the applicant on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties, suspending execution of sentence until

What the court decided

AI extract

Ramswaroop S/O Shri Gullaram Vs the State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:11093]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 255/2026

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No-1075/2025

¶6

Ramswaroop S/o Shri Gullaram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Teja Ki Dhani, Tan Loharwada, Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur (Presently Confined In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

_____________ For Petitioner(s)	_______ : Jh Jh Jh	__________________________ jkts'k x<+oky iq"isUnz dqekj veunhi
For Respondent(s)	: Jh	lqns'k dqekj lSuh+] yksd vfHk;kstd e;
______________	Jh _______	uonhi flag __________________________

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶13

Order

¶14

16-03-2026

¶15

vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;ky; ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e 2012 t;iqj ftyk }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k& 11@2022] ljdkj cuke jkeLo:i esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 16-04-2025 ds fo:) ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds }kjk vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/kksa esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj vFkZn.M lfgr vf/kdre chl o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS A

cgl lquh xbZA

[2026:RJ-JP:11093]

[SOSA-255/2026]

(2 of 3)

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk lexz foospu o fo'ys"k.k fd, fcuk vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ,oa n.Mkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 17-01-2022 ls yxkrkj vfHkj{kk esa g S A Mh-,u-,fjiksVZ vihykFkhZ ds fo:) ugha jgh gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr ds HkkbZ izgykn dqM+h iq= xqYykjke dqMh }kjk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ 08@2022 fnukad 12-01-2022 dks iqfyl Fkkuk dkykMsjk esa ntZ djok;h xbZ FkhA mDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds rhu fnu i'pkr~ ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djok;h xbZ gS A vihy esa muds }kjk tks vk/kkj fy, x, gaS mlds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ nks"keqDr gksus ;ksX; gS] izLrqr vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

¶21

blds foijhr fo}ku fof'k"V yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶22

ifjoknh i{k dh vksj ls ckotwn rkehy dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gS A

¶23

geus mHk;i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa o fordksZa ij euu fd;k] i=koyh ij miyC/k leLr lk{; o lkexzh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa] vihykFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶24

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@& :i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 16-04-2026 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr

[2026:RJ-JP:11093]

[SOSA-255/2026]

(3 of 3)

fd;k tkos] mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk] rks vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jkeLo:i iq= Jh xqYykjke dks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, n.Mkns'k (sentence) dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA

¶29

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶30

Rishikesh Soni/53sos

Ramswaroop S/O Shri Gullaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ramswaroop S/O Shri Gullaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh @ Kali S/O Shibburam Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Kumar Son of Shri Bhagwan Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Guman Singh Son of Ramnath @ Harinath Vs Surendra Singh Son of Bheem Singh

Anil Agarwal Son of Shri Mangilal Agarwal Vs Mahaveer Prasad Yadav, S/O Shri Harchand Yadav

Ankit Kumar Son of Laduram Vs State of Rajasthan

Bheem Bahadur S/O Harisingh Vs State of Rajasthan