Allowed

Naresh Kumar Kathuriya S/O Kishanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Feb 2026SOSA/2257/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspension of sentence application against conviction and ten years' imprisonment in a sessions case. Considering arguments on evidence, delay in recording a witness's Section 161 statement, medical testimony discrepancy and period already undergone, the High Court suspended the sentence subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended till final decision of the appeal on furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Naresh Kumar Kathuriya S/O Kishanlal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:7566]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 2257/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2949/2025

¶6

Naresh Kumar Kathuriya S/o Kishanlal, R/o Near Jain Madir Khidki Darwaja, P.s. Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj). (At Present In Central Jail Bharatpur)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P. Mr. Amitesh Rana

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶13

Order

¶14

17/02/2026

¶15

vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ujs'k dqekj dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky;& vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] oSj] ftyk Hkjriqj }kjk lS'ku izdj.k la[;k& 112@2021 ¼75@2018½ ¼68@2016½ ljdkj cuke ujs'k dqekj dFkwfj;k esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 17-10-2025 ds fo:) ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds }kjk vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/kksa esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj vFkZn.M lfgr vf/kdre nl o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA

¶16

cgl lquh xbZA

¶17

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk lexz foospu o

[2026:RJ-JP:7566]

[SOSA-2257/2025]

(2 of 3)

fo'ys"k.k fd, fcuk vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ,oa n.Mkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd bl ?kVuk esa et:c Fkku flag gS] ftlds c;ku varxZr /kkjk 161 n0iz0la0 fnukad 02-11-2016 dks ys[kc) fd, x, gSa] tcfd ?kVuk fnukad 08-09-2016 dh crkbZ xbZ gSA Fkku flag dk bykt ,l0,e0,l0 vLirky esa gksuk crk;k x;k gS rFkk fpfdRlk fo'ks"kK lk{kh ih0M013 MkW0 nhid 'kekZ us vius izfrijh{k.k esa crk;k gS fd tc et:c ,l0,e0,l0 vLirky t;iqj esa HkrhZ gqvk rks HkrhZ fVdV esa et:c ds Qk;j vkElZ dh pksV ck;sa dku esa yxus dk vadu gS] tcfd et:c Fkkuflag }kjk ydM+h ds gRFks ls pksV ekjuk crk;k x;k gS] bu fcUnqvksa ij Hkh fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk lexz :i ls foospu o fo'ys"k.k ugha fd;k x;k gS] mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd vihy esa vfHk;qDr ds nks"keqDr gksus ds lqn`<+ ,oa i;kZIr vk/kkj fo|eku gSa] mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd vihykFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k djhc nks o"kZ pkj ekg dh gks pqdh gS rFkk vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶22

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd ,oa ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh us bldk fojks/k djrs gq, izLrqr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶23

geus mHk; i{kksa ds rdksZa fordksZa ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa] vihykFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k rFkk izLrqr vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶24

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@& :i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa

[2026:RJ-JP:7566]

[SOSA-2257/2025]

(3 of 3)

25]000&25000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og bl U;k;ky; esa fn- 17-03-2026 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] og mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk] rks vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ujs'k dqekj dFkwfj;k iq= Jh fd'kuyky dks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶29

fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, n.Mkns'k ¼sentence½ dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA

¶30

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶31

MANOJ ADWANI /29

Naresh Kumar Kathuriya S/O Kishanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar Kathuriya S/O Kishanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramdhan Son of Shri Ramlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Singh Son of Mahendra Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Gola @ Bakhtawar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Liyakat S/O Nasib Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Baljindar Singh S/O Shri Sarjit Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Saleem Son of Jamasa Vs the State of Rajasthan