Allowed

Surendra Son of Brahmanand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Apr 2026SOSA/1819/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three under-trial convicts residing in judicial custody filed SOSA applications seeking suspension of enhanced sentences. The High Court held that further custodial interrogation to secure withheld FIR documents was unnecessary and directed the police to submit the documents without physical presence of the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Orders directed that further custodial interrogation of petitioners for FIR documents be dispensed with and petitioners granted temporary release; subsequently recalled if documents not produced.

Surendra Son of Brahmanand Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:15705]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1765/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2371/2025

¶6

Anil Son Of Bhagwandas, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Dilli Darwaja Bahar, Alwar, Police Station Kotwali, Alwar (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1819/2025

¶13

¶14

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2441/2025

¶15

Surendra Son Of Brahmanand, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Lalkhan, Akhepura, Alwar, Police Station-Kotwali, Alwar (Rajasthan) (Accused Appellant Is Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶19

----Respondent

¶20

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 2109/2025

¶21

¶22

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2576/2025

¶23

¶24

Pawan @ Lakhha S/o Ramesh Chawariya, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Lalkhan, Akkhepura, Alwar, Police Station Kotwali, Alwar, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar)

¶25

[SOSA-1765/2025]

¶26

[2026:RJ-JP:15705] (2 of 4) [SOSA-1765/2025] 2. Sandeep S/o Ramesh Chawariya, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Lalkhan, Akkhepura, Alwar, Police Station Kotwali, Alwar, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar)

¶27

----Petitioners

¶28

Versus

¶29

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶30

----Respondent

¶31

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Gurvindra Singh
	Ms. Palak Rohila
	Mr. Rakesh Kumar with Ms. Priyanka Chauhan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, P.P. Mr. Manish Kumar

¶32

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶33

Order

¶34

15/04/2026

¶35

vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k vfuy] lqjsUnz] iou mQZ yD[kk ,oa lanhi dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch0,u0,l0,l0 ds varxZr] fopkj.k U;k;ky;& fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] v0tk0@v0t0tk0 ¼v0fu0½ izdj.k] ftyk vyoj ¼jkt0½ }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k& 130@2019 ¼lh0vkbZ0,l0 ua0 122@2019½ jktLFkku jkT; cuke iou mQZ yD[kk ,oa vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 11-08-2025 ds fo:) mDr rhuksa iFkd&iFkd ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;s x, gS] ftlds }kjk vfHk;qDrx.k dks vkjksfir vijk/kksa esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj vFkZn.M lfgr vf/kdre nl o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA rhuksa ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= ,d gh fu.kZ;@n.Mkns'k ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk fuLrkj.k ,d lkFk fd;k tk jgk gSA

[2026:RJ-JP:15705]

[SOSA-1765/2025]

(3 of 4)

cgl lquh xbZA

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk lexz foospu o fo'ys"k.k fd, fcuk vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ,oa n.Mkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fopkj.k ds nkSjku os dqN le; U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa jgs gSa rRi'pkr~ os tekur ij vktkn jgs gaS rFkk os fu.kZ; dh fnukad 11-08-2025 ls yxkrkj U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSa rFkk vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k ,d o"kZ ls vf/kd dh gks pqdh gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fpfdRlk fo'ks"kK lk{kh dh jk; ds vuqlkj vkgr vkdk'k ds izk.k?kkrd pksVsa gksuk ugha ikbZ xbZ gSa] lk{khx.k dh lk{; esa fojks/kkHkkl gS] fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh esa vkbZ lk{; ,oa rF;ksa dk lexzrk ls ,oa lgh :i ls foospu&fo'ys"k.k ugha fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izLrqr vihyksa esa vihykFkhZx.k ds nks"keqDr gksus ds lqn`<+ ,oa i;kZIr vk/kkj fo|eku gSa] vihyksa ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS] vr% izLrqr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶41

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i=ksa dk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ fn;k fd et:c vkdk'k ds Qk;j vkElZ ls pksVsa vkbZ gSa] izdj.k dh izd`fr xaHkhj gS] vr% izLrqr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i=ksa dks fujLr fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶42

geus mHk; i{k ds rdksZa&fordksZa ij euu fd;k] vkgr vkdk'k ds c;ku ,oa fpfdRlk fo'ks"kK lk{kh ds c;ku ,oa laiw.kZ i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA vr% izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izdj.k dh leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa] vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k ,oa vihyksa ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, bu izdj.kksa ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd, fcuk ;s ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶43

(4 of 4) [SOSA-1765/2025]

¶44

[2026:RJ-JP:15705]

¶45

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;s rhuksa ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;s tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd os bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 15-05-2026 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mUgsa vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] mifLFkr gksrs jgsaxs] rks vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- vfuy iq= Jh Hkxokunkl] 2- lqjsUnz iq= Jh czg~ekuan] 3- iou mQZ yD[kk iq= Jh jes'k pkofj;k ,oa 4- lanhi iq= Jh jes'k pkofj;k dks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶46

fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, n.Mkns'k ¼sentence½ dk fdz;kUo;u bu vihyksa ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA

¶47

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶48

MAHESH ADWANI /37-39

Surendra Son of Brahmanand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Son of Brahmanand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kailash Chandra Prajapati S/O Shri Bhomaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pavan Son of Bharatlal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ruparam Son of Shri Bal Sahay @ Baluram Vs State of Rajasthan

Shaitan Singh Meena @ Tillu S/O Shri Prahlad Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Son of Bhagwandas, Vs State of Rajasthan

Karudas S/O Shri Jagdish, Vs State of Rajasthan