Dismissed¶18

Director v. Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Sant Lal

Rajasthan HC12 Jan 2026SAW/406/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 17B Industrial Disputes Act 1947 application allowed; RSRTC Sikar Depot; respondent workman Manoj Kumar allowed to join duties vide order dated 26.03.2021; appeal against order dated 19.11.2018 dismissed as infructuous; D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 406/2019; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur; Inderjeet Singh J and Ravi Chirania J.

What did the court decide?

In view of the subsequent development whereby the appellants allowed the respondent-workman to join duties vide order dated 26.03.2021 (copy taken on record), the present appeal has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. ¶18

Director Vs Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Sant Lal — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 406/2019

¶3

Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶4

The Executive Director (Mechanical), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶5

Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Sikar Depot, Sikar (Rajasthan)

¶6

----Appellants

¶7

Versus

¶8

Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Sant Lal, Resident Of Kaliaka Nangal, Post Sirohi - Mahali, Tehsil Narno, District Mahendragarh (Haryana)

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Appellant(s)	: Mr.	Om Prakash Sheoren
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Ankul Gupta with
	Mr.	Rahul Ghiya for
	Mr.	Babu Lal Gupta

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶12

Order

¶13

12/01/2026

¶14

This appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the order dated 19.11.2018, whereby the application filed on behalf of the respondent workman under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was allowed.

¶15

It has been informed to this Court that the appellants vide order dated 26.03.2021 have allowed the respondent-workman to join the duties. The copy of trhe order dated 26.03.2021 is taken on record.

¶16

[SAW-406/2019]

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

In view of the subsequent development, as stated above, the present appeal has become infructuous and the same is dismissed accordingly.

¶19

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶20

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶21

Dushyant/140