Asoo S/O Rukamveer Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 May 2026HC/127/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Habeas corpus; minor girl custody; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench (Division Bench); H.C. Petition No. 127/2026; petitioner Asoo s/o Rukamveer Singh (Reengus, Sikar); corpus aged about 15 years; respondent Roshan s/o Yudhharam (Bhopatpura, Reengus); SHO P.S. Reengus / Ringus; Anti Human Traffic Unit; custody handed to father; order dated 11/05/2026; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Custody of the minor corpus (aged about 15 years) handed over to her father, petitioner Asoo, with a protective direction to the SHO, P.S. Reengus, that no harm be caused to her while going with her father; habeas corpus petition disposed of. ¶¶25

Asoo S/O Rukamveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:19754-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 127/2026

¶4

Asoo S/o Rukamveer Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 45, Near Lal Tanki, Model Town, Panipat, Haryana, Presently Residing At Ward No. 11, Neem Nagar, Reengus, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj.

¶8

The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶9

Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Traffic Unit Rajasthan Jaipur.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Sikar.

¶11

SHO, Police Station Reengus, District Sikar.

¶12

Roshan S/o Yudhharam, R/o Bhopatpura, Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhruv Atri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary,GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma and Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Dalip, SI, P.S. Ringus, District Sikar Ms. Sunita, FC No. 1377

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶16

Order

¶17

11/05/2026

¶18

This habeas corpus petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner–Asoo.

¶19

Today the concerned SHO has produced the corpus before

¶20

us. Admittedly, the corpus is minor aged about 15 years.

¶21

(2 of 2)

¶22

[2026:RJ-JP:19754-DB]

¶23

[HC-127/2026]

¶24

We have interacted with the corpus and she has firmly stated before us that she wants to go with her father-Asoo, who is present in the Court.

¶25

Considering the statement made by the corpus before us and also considering the fact that she is minor and below 18 years of age, we permit the corpus to live with her father. Custody of the corpus is handed over to her father, who is present in the Court and identified by the counsel for the petitioner as well as the concerned SHO.

¶26

The concerned SHO is directed to ensure that no harm should be caused to the corpus by anyone while going with her father.

¶27

In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of.

¶28

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶29

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶30

Ritu/4

Asoo S/O Rukamveer Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asoo S/O Rukamveer Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Nitharwal S/O Shri Pokhar Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sahib Khan S/O Shokat Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Mahla @ Pintu S/O Shri Richhapal Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal S/O Mularam Vs the State of Rajasthan

Manoj Swami Son of Shri Mahesh Swami, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Union of India Vs Ajeet Singh Son of Shri Bhojraj Singh