Dismissed¶22

Mohammad Shreef S/O Imamudeen v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Apr 2026HC/103/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Habeas corpus petition withdrawn with liberty — Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 103/2026; decided 06/04/2026 by Mahendar Kumar Goyal and Bhawan Goyal, JJ.; petitioner Mohammad Shreef (Neem Ka Thana, Sikar / Jhotwara, Jaipur); respondents include State of Rajasthan (Home Affairs), Commissioner of Police Jaipur Metropolitan, S.H.O. P.S. Jhotwara, ADG (Anti-Human Trafficking Unit), and private persons Makbul and Firoz; dismissed as withdrawn; no statutes or precedents cited; useful only for citation of withdrawal-with-liberty practice, not on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law for redressal of the petitioner's grievance(s) ¶22

Mohammad Shreef S/O Imamudeen Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:14019-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 103/2026

¶4

Mohammad Shreef S/o Imamudeen, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Village Dareeba, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. At Present, R/o House No. 23, Makka Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan.

¶9

S.H.O., Police Station Jhotwara, Jaipur.

¶10

The Additional Director General Of Police, (Anti-Human Trafficking Unit), Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶11

Makbul S/o Rafik Ahmed, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Mohalla Balayo Ka Chala, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶12

Firoz S/o Rafik Ahmed, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Mohalla Balayo Ka Chala, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mohd. Anees
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with
	Mr. Aman Agarwal
	Ms. Neha Goyal
	Mr. Vinod Sharma

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶16

Order

¶17

06/04/2026

¶18

[2026:RJ-JP:14019-DB]

¶19

[HC-103/2026]

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this habeas corpus petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law for redressal of his grievance(s).

¶22

The habeas corpus petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶23

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶24

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

¶25

Tahir/4

Mohammad Shreef S/O Imamudeen v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Shreef S/O Imamudeen v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Raj. Vs Kamal Kumar

Shiv Raj Gurjar S/O Raghuvar Dayal Gurjar B/C Gurjr Vs State of Rajasthan

Aradhana Tripathi W/O Shri Akhilesh Tripathi Vs the State of Rajasthan

State of Raj. Vs Narottam and Ors.

Balram Singh Yadav S/O Shri Modya Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Vinod Kanwar Alias Veenu W/O Shri Narendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan