The High Court dismissed this writ petition challenging the petitioner's reversion from Joint Legal Remembrancer to Deputy Legal Remembrancer, upholding the order based on the seniority and better claims of other candidates left out of promotion.
The writ petition challenging the order of reversion is dismissed with no interference with the lower authority's decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:35282]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 787/2002
CNR: RJHC020221912002 | URN: CW / 1162U / 2002
Sita Ram Son of Shri Ram Pal Ji Sethi, aged about 56 years, Resident of 81, Janakpuri-II, Imli Wala Phatak, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through Secretary to the Govt. of Rajasthan, Ministry of Law.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : None Present |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Yash Joshi, AAAG & |
| Ms. Monisha Agarwal, Adv. for | |
| Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
02/09/2026
(2 of 2) [CW-787/2002]
[2026:RJ-JP:35282]
post of Joint Legal Remembrancer, hence, their claims were better than the claim of the petitioner for promotion on the post of Joint Legal Remembrancer.
(ANAND SHARMA),J
2/Jatin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order of reversion of the petitioner from Joint Legal Remembrancer to Deputy Legal Remembrancer is liable to be quashed.
Whether the promotion order was valid given that senior persons were left out and their claims were better.
Sita Ram
State of Rajasthan
Anand Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
