Disposed

Gy Fitness Center v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Apr 2026CW/5961/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Fitness center proprietor sought adjudication of a representation made to the transport authorities. The court directed the authority to decide the representation within 15 days, following an earlier writ decision and a Chief Secretary circular, with hearing to the petitioner, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondent-authority directed to decide petitioner's representation within 15 days in accordance with law, giving petitioner audience on 15.04.2026; petition disposed with liberty.

Gy Fitness Center Vs State of Rajasthan — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:14390]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5961/2026

¶4

Gy Fitness Center, F-19, F-20, Riico Industrial Area, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) Through Its Proprietor Yogendra Kumar Soni S/o Shri Late Sahab Soni, Age 52 Years, R/o-E-464, Murlipura Scheme Murlipura Jaipur (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Transport And Road Safety Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶8

Joint Transport Commissioner, (Rules) Transport And Road Safety Department (Raj.)

¶9

Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur Registering Authority (Ats) Transport Department, (Raj.)

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Dr.	P. C. Jain with
	Mr.	Satish Kumar Khandelwal &
	Ms.	VinnyJain
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	S. S. Naruka,AAG

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶13

Order

¶14

07/04/2026

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation (Annexure-5) addressing his grievances before the Competent Authority. It is submitted that petitioner invested substantially high amount and has submitted reasonable ground for grant of his prayer by way of the said representation. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has marked presence before the Court and has no objection to the contention

[2026:RJ-JP:14390]

[CW-5961/2026]

(2 of 2)

put forth by learned counsel for the petitioner qua adjudication of the representation.

¶20

Heard.

¶21

This Court directs respondent-authority to consider the representation of the petitioner, and decide the same within a period of 15 days from the date of passing of this order, strictly in accordance with law as per the ratio encapsulated in light of

¶22

Pawan Meena v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.

¶23

1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vu q -&1@2012). It is also directed that audience be given to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to mark his presence before the respondentauthority on 15.04.2026 at 11.00 AM.

¶24

In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶25

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶26

Pooja /146

Gy Fitness Center v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gy Fitness Center v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemachal Vs State Home Departmentors

Rajmal Meghwal S/O Ramdev Meghwal Vs Mahendra Kumawat S/O Ramswaroop Kumawat

Smt. Khushboo W/O Sh. Surendra Vs State of Rajasthan

I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Vs Smt. Santosh Devi Meena W/O Late Shri Duli Chand Meena

Dharamveer Sharma S/O Shri Shyam Lal Sharma, Vs Union of India

Haider Ali Khan S/O Mubarik Khan Vs Union of India