Service writ petition disposed in light of the ratio in Bimala Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan. If that ratio applies, petitioner gets the same benefits as directed by the Division Bench; otherwise respondents must decide the issue by a reasoned speaking order within 60 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:5294]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5631/2019
Ker Singh Gurjar S/o. Sh. Kamal Singh Gurjar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Village Shahadpur, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. Sara Praveen |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Pulkit Bhardwaj on behalf of Mr. |
| Vigyan Shah, AAG | |
| Mr. Nalin G. Narain |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
04/02/2026
1 Considered application no. 2/2026 filed for correction in the name of cause title whereby the petitioner has requested that his father’s name has been mentioned as “Kawal Singh Gurjar” but correct name is Kamal Singh Gurjar.
on record.
[2026:RJ-JP:5294]
[CW-5631/2019]
(2 of 2)
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
CHETNA BEHRANI /37
1 issue framed by the court
Is the petitioner entitled to the same benefits as directed in Bimala Kumari, and if not, must respondents decide the issue by reasoned order within 60 days?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bimala Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Applied
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 152/2023 decided on 27.11.2025
Ker Singh Gurjar
The State Of Rajasthan
Rajasthan Sub Ordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board
Ashok Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
