Disposed

Shri Ram Prasad S/O Teja Ram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Feb 2026CW/1904/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vehicle owners whose Registration Certificates were suspended sought relief. Following a co-ordinate bench decision in Tofik Ahmed, the court set aside the suspension, required petitioners to report to the notice-issuing authority with an explanation, and directed adjudication within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of petitioners' vehicle Registration Certificates set aside, subject to reporting to the notice-issuing authority on 16.02.2026 with explanation and subsequent adjudication within 15 days.

Shri Ram Prasad S/O Teja Ram Meena Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:4805]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1904/2026

¶4

Shri Ram Prasad S/o Teja Ram Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vill Ganesh Nagar Shyopur Road Pratapnagar Teh Sanganer Jaipur,(Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj14Rd0030.

¶5

Omprakash Meena S/o Tejaram Meena, R/o Buhariya Watika Road Shyampur Pratapnagar Sanganer Jaipur, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj14Re2940.

¶6

Subhash S/o Jagdish, R/o Randhisar Sujangarh Churu, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj18Gb2753.

¶7

Jitendra Aswal S/o Jagdish, R/o Randhisar Ratangarh Churu, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj44Ga3611

¶8

Rajendra Kumar S/o Ghisa Ram, R/o Randhisar Ratangarh Churu, (Rajasthan). Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj13Gb3277.

¶9

----Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary.

¶12

Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.

¶13

Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶14

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar. (Rajasthan).

¶15

District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror. (Rajasthan).

¶16

District Tansport Officer, Dto Office Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu. (Rajasthan).

¶17

District Transport Officer, Dto Office Shahpura, District Jaipur. (Rajasthan).

¶18

District Transport Officer, Dto Office Sujangarh, District

(2 of 4)

[2026:RJ-JP:4805]

[CW-1904/2026]

Churu. (Rajasthan).

District Transport Officer, Dto Office Didwana, District Nagaur. ( Rajasthan).

¶24

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur (First), District Jaipur. (Rajasthan).

¶25

Regional Transport Office, Rto Office Jagatpura, District Jaipur. (Rajasthan).

¶26

----Respondents

¶27

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surjeet Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Rathore, AAAG & Ms. Ritika Naruka for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG

¶28

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶29

Order

¶30

02/02/2026

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ

¶32

Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of

¶33

Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025.

¶34

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State agrees and submits that the present writ may also be decided in the light of the directions passed in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra).

¶35

Operative parts of the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court are as follows :-

¶36

“6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration

(3 of 4)

[2026:RJ-JP:4805]

[CW-1904/2026]

Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days.

¶41

Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶42

It is made clear that during the period of consideration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as registered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado.

¶43

It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order.

¶44

In the light of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.”

¶45

Accordingly, in view of the directions given in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), the present writ petition also stands disposed off as under:-

¶46

(i) The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners are suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. The aforesaid revocation shall only

[2026:RJ-JP:4805]

[CW-1904/2026]

(4 of 4)

be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners alongwith their counsel concerned shall report to/before the notice issuing authority on 16.02.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and submit the explanation.

¶51

(ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶52

Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶53

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶54

Ashish Kumar /73

Shri Ram Prasad S/O Teja Ram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Ram Prasad S/O Teja Ram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Son of Khyaliram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kailash Chand Sansi S/O Shri Shiv Karan Sansi Vs State of Rajasthan

Mintu Singh S/O Kashmir Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalamuddin S/O Shabbir Khan Vs the State of Rajasthan

M/S Singhal Bio Resources Vs State of Rajasthan

Prakash S/O Sugan Vs State of Rajasthan