Rampal S/O Sh. Ramniwas Yadav, Vs the State of Rajasthan

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17118/2025

Rampal S/o Sh. Ramniwas Yadav, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Shyodansinghpura, Gram Panchayat Khohar, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan (Aadhaar No. 5987 8302 6972) (Pan No. Cafpr6017M) Mobile No. 9057843707

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶7

The Collector And District Magistrate Cum Chairman, Plpc, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.

¶8

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar, Rajasthan.

¶9

The Sub Divisional Officer, Behror, District Kotputli-Bheror, Rajasthan.

¶10

The Tehsildar, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.

¶11

The Development Officer, Panchayatsamiti, Behror, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary with Mr. Himanshu
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG with
	Ms. Rashmi Kaushik and
	Mr. Dev Kumar
	Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma

¶14

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶15

05/05/2026

¶16

The present writ petition has been filed with the following

¶17

prayers:

¶18

“i) By an appropriate writ or order or direction or in nature thereof direct the respondents to inspect the

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CW-17118/2025]

¶21

spot and identify the land which is alleged to be charagah land and being used for construction of interlocking road.

¶22

ii) Respondents may kindly be further directed that depending upon the spot inspection report, if it is found that it is a land of charagah, the respondent authority shall issue necessary direction in this regard and if it is found as Aabadi land then work of interlocking is done within time

¶23

iii) Respondent may kindly be further directed the authority sanction and financial sanction will not be cancelled.

¶24

iv) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble High Court may consider just a proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.

¶25

v) Cost or this writ petition (PIL) may also kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner”

¶26

At the outset, Mr. G.S. Gill, learned Additional Advocate General submits that most of the encroachments have already been removed and the State is committed to remove all remaining encroachments. The compliance report with respect to the same is already on record.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with such statement as well as the compliance report.

¶28

In light of the compliance report and the submissions made by learned AAG, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the State to act strictly in accordance with the compliance report. 5. All pending applications, including I.A. No. 1/2026 seeking impleadment of the applicant as respondent No. 6, are accordingly disposed of.

¶29

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶30

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶31

Diksha Mishra/7

Rampal S/O Sh. Ramniwas Yadav, v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rampal S/O Sh. Ramniwas Yadav, v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madho Singh Maderna S/O Prabhu Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghuveer Singh S/O Shri Bacchan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Archit Gupta S/O Shri Radheshyam Gupta Vs Union of India

Deepti Chinaria Daughter of Shri Vinod Kumar Chinaria Vs Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited

Ramji Lal Saini S/O Shri Sonya Saini Vs the State of Rajasthan

Prahlad Singh Tanwar, Son of Shaktidan Singh Tanwar Vs State of Rajasthan