Vikram Meena S/O Shri Chhotu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:5659]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1311/2026

¶4

Vikram Meena S/o Shri Chhotu Ram, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 07, Buchara, Jaipur, Rajasthan-303106. Owner Of Truck No. Rj 52 Ga 6330.

¶5

M/s Khusabu Minerals And Mines, Through Its Proprietor/owner, Subhash Chand Meena S/o Shri Chhotu Ram, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 06, Buchara, Jaipur, Rajasthan-303106. Owner Of Truck No. Rj 32 Gc 5390.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary.

¶9

Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.

¶10

Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶11

District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputli, District Kotputli. (Rajasthan).

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Rathore, AAAG & Ms. Ritika Naruka for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶15

Order

¶16

06/02/2026

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition, has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ

¶18

(2 of 3) [CW-1311/2026]

¶19

[2026:RJ-JP:5659]

¶20

Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State agrees and submits that the present writ petition may also be decided in the light of the directions passed in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra).

¶22

Operative parts of the order dated 20.11.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), are as follows :-

¶23

“6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days.

¶24

Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶25

It is made clear that during the period of consideration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as registered and entered upon the

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:5659]

[CW-1311/2026]

official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado.

¶30

It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order.

¶31

In the light of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.”

¶32

Accordingly, in view of the directions given in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), the present writ petition also stands disposed off as under:-

¶33

(i) The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners were suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. The aforesaid revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to/before the Notice Issuing Authority on 19.02.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and shall submit their explanation.

¶34

(ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶35

Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶36

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶37

ARTI SHARMA /49

Vikram Meena S/O Shri Chhotu Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Meena S/O Shri Chhotu Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Balaji Steel Industries Vs State of Rajasthan

Nisha Kumari W/O Naresh Kumar D/O Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Atal Son of Shri Kaluram Vs Jaipur Development Authority (Jda)

Dargah Committee Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dargah Committee Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dargah Committee, Vs the State of Rajasthan