Disposed

Maharam Gurajr S/O Shri Malaram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Jul 2026CW/11589/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against e-notices by the Mining and Geology Department suspending petitioners' vehicle registration certificates for overloading or alteration. Court disposed of the petition with directions that petitioners appear before the concerned authority within one week with documents and vehicles for inspection; hearing to be completed within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to appear before competent authority within one week with vehicles/documents; authority to hear and pass orders within two weeks.

Maharam Gurajr S/O Shri Malaram Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:25718]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11589/2026 URN: CW / 25648U / 2026

¶4

Maharam Gurajr S/o Shri Malaram Gurjar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Haripura Chhaja Ki Nangal, Sikar (Rajasthan) (Vehicles Registration No. Rj 23 Gc 2163)

¶5

Pappu Singh S/o Shri Girdhari Singh, R/o Mohalla Gaal Wala Nahreda Tehsil Kotputli District Kotputli Behror (Rajasthan) (Vehicles Registration No. Rj 32 Gd 0572).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary.

¶9

Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.

¶10

Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶11

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar (Rajasthan).

¶12

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror (Rajasthan).

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana For Respondent(s) : Mr. S S Naruka, AAG with Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG

¶15

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶16

Order

¶17

09/07/2026

¶18

;kphx.k dh vksj ls ;g fjV ;kfpdk [kku ,oa HkwfoKku foHkkx }kjk tkjh bZ&joUuk ls ;kph ds okguksa ds vf/kd Hkkj (Overloading)@cnyko (alteration) ds vk/kkj ij] fcuk uksfVl fn, muds okgu dk iath;u izek.k&i=

(2 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:25718]

[CW-11589/2026]

(Registration Certificate) fuyfEcr (suspend) fd, tkus ds vkns'k ls O;fFkr gksdj bl vuqrks"k ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gS %&

¶23

"It is, therefore, humble prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and may be further be pleased to call for the entire record of the case and by way of appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, thereby, issue the necessary direction(s) to the respondents :-

¶24

(i) The respondents be directed to revoke the suspension of registration certificate of the vehicles of the petitioners;

¶25

(ii) The respondent be directed to remove the vehicles/trucks of the petitioner from blacklisting/Not to be transacted (NTBT)/ Blok

¶26

(iii) cost of writ petition may also be awarded in favour of petitioner,

¶27

(iv) any other order (s) which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the Case."

¶28

v;kph@foHkkx dh vksj ls vkt fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk Jh ,l-,l-u:dk vfxze uksfVl ij mifLFkr gSa] mUgsa ;kfpdk dh izfr miyC/k djkbZ xbZA

¶29

nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k us izdV fd;k fd bl ekeys eas tks iz'u vUroZfyr (involve) gS] ogh leku iz'u bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk U;kf;d fu.kZ; Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. No. 9721 rFkk Mustak and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. 20073/2025 esa fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% mDr fu.kZ;ksa ds izdk'k esa gh bl izdj.k dks Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶30

fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh lhfer izkFkZuk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g fjV ;kfpdk bl funsZ'k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd ;kphx.k vius&vius okguksa rFkk tokc lfgr lEcfU/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ¼ftuds }kjk muds okguksa dk iath;u izek.k&i= fuyfEcr fd;k x;k gS½] ds le{k bl vkns'k dh frfFk ls ,d

¶31

(3 of 3) [CW-11589/2026]

¶32

[2026:RJ-JP:25718]

¶33

LkIrkg ds Hkhrj vko';d :i ls mifLFkr gksaxsA rri'pkr l{ke vf/kdkjh }kjk nks lIrkg dh vof/k esa lquokbZ dj vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk;sxkA

¶34

lacaf/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ds le{k lR;kiu@fujh{k.k gsrq okgu ys tkus ds vfrfjDr ;kphx.k mDr vof/k ds nkSjku vius&vius okguksa dks vU; m)s'; ds fy, yksd ekxZ ij pykus ds fy, vf/kd`r ugha gksaxsA

¶35

rn~uqlkj ;kfpdk o fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶36

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶37

33/VISHAL SHARMA

Maharam Gurajr S/O Shri Malaram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharam Gurajr S/O Shri Malaram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

United India Insurance Company Limited, Vs Savita W/O Late Arun Kumar

Kedarnath Gupta S/O Sh. Shyamlal Gupta Vs Veyant Kaur W/O Late Sh. Mahendra Singh

Hanuman Sahay Saini S/O Nand Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Priyanshi Joshi D/O Shri Hanuman Prasad Joshi @ H.P. Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay @ Ajju S/O Ramratan Vs State of Rajasthan

Arjun Ram S/O Hira Ram Vs State of Rajasthan