Disposed

Munfed S/O Shri Jan Mohmmad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jul 2026CW/11517/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging suspension of vehicle registration certificates due to overloading. Court treated the petition based on settled principles from prior judgments and directed respondents to hear representations within two weeks after the petitioners appeared with vehicles for inspection.

What did the court decide?

Direction to hear representations regarding suspension of RCs after inspection of vehicles.

Munfed S/O Shri Jan Mohmmad Vs State of Rajasthan — Motor Accident Claims | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:25546]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11517/2026 URN: CW / 25496U / 2026

¶4

Munfed S/o Shri Jan Mohmmad, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhulli Bass, Chhapra, Tehsil Pahari, Bharatpur, Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Rj-05Gb-9790, Rj-05Gb-8332.

¶5

Atc And Company, Through Its Proprietor Shri Rajak S/o Shri Atar Khan, Registered Office At Village Tapkan Tehsil Nuh, Mewat, (Haryana), Owner Of Truck Beaing No. Hr74B-5853, Hr-74B-2350, Hr-74B-9382, Hr-74B-2124, Hr74B-3952, Hr-74B-9135, Hr-74B-2984, Hr-74B-2154, Hr74B-6440.

¶6

Saddam S/o Shri Fajru, R/o Lewra, Bharatpur, Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Rj-05Gc-0507.

¶7

Amjad Khan S/o Shri Ayyub Khan, R/o H No.83, Village Kankraula, Gurgaon, (Haryana), Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Hr-55Am-7171.

¶8

Saif Trading Company, Through Its Proprietor Shri Amjad Khan S/o Shri Ayyub Khan, Registered Office At Near Bijli Board, Nuh, Delhi Alwar Road, Mewat, (Haryana), Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Hr-74B-3124.

¶9

----Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶12

The Joint Secretary, Mines And Geology Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶13

Regional Transport Officer, Bharatpur.

¶14

Regional Transport Officer, Alwar.

¶15

District Transport Officer, Kotputali, District Kotputali Behror.

¶16

Regional Transport Officer, Sikar.

¶17

Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur First.

¶18

Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur-Ii.

¶19

District Transport Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶20

District Transport Officer, Bhiwadi, District Alwar.

[2026:RJ-JP:25546]

[CW-11517/2026]

(2 of 3)

----Respondents

¶25

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. R.K.	Goyal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S.S.	Naruka, AAG
	with Ms.	Ritika Naruka

¶26

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶27

Order

¶28

08/07/2026

¶29

;kphx.k dh vksj ls ;g fjV ;kfpdk [kku ,oa HkwfoKku foHkkx }kjk tkjh bZ&joUuk ls ;kph ds okguksa ds vf/kd Hkkj (Overloading)@cnyko (alteration) ds vk/kkj ij] fcuk uksfVl fn, muds okgu dk iath;u izek.k&i= (Registration Certificate) fuyfEcr (suspend) fd, tkus ds vkns'k ls O;fFkr gksdj bl vuqrks"k ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gS %&

¶30

"It is, therefore, humble prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and may be further be pleased to call for the entire record of the case and by way of appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, theeby, issue the necessary direction(s) to the respondents :-

¶31

(i) respondents be directed to revoke the suspension of registration certificate of the vehicles of the petitioners;

¶32

(ii) cost of writ petition may also be awarded in favour of petitioner,

¶33

(iii) and may pass any other oder (s) which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the Case."

¶34

v;kph@foHkkx dh vksj ls vkt fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk Jh ,l-,l-u:dk vfxze uksfVl ij mifLFkr gSa] mUgsa ;kfpdk dh izfr miyC/k djkbZ xbZA

¶35

nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k us izdV fd;k fd bl ekeys eas tks iz'u vUroZfyr (involve) gS] ogh leku iz'u bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk U;kf;d fu.kZ; Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. No. 9721 rFkk Mustak and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. 20073/2025 esa fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% mDr fu.kZ;ksa ds izdk'k esa gh bl izdj.k dks Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

[2026:RJ-JP:25546]

[CW-11517/2026]

(3 of 3)

fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh lhfer izkFkZuk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g fjV ;kfpdk bl funsZ'k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd ;kphx.k vius&vius okguksa rFkk tokc lfgr lEcfU/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ¼ftuds }kjk muds okguksa dk iath;u izek.k&i= fuyfEcr fd;k x;k gS½] ds le{k bl vkns'k dh frfFk ls ,d LkIrkg ds Hkhrj vko';d :i ls mifLFkr gksaxsA rri'pkr l{ke vf/kdkjh }kjk nks lIrkg dh vof/k esa lquokbZ dj vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk;sxkA

¶40

lacaf/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ds le{k lR;kiu@fujh{k.k gsrq okgu ys tkus ds vfrfjDr ;kphx.k mDr vof/k ds nkSjku vius&vius okguksa dks vU; m)s'; ds fy, yksd ekxZ ij pykus ds fy, vf/kd`r ugha gksaxsA rn~uqlkj ;kfpdk o fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶41

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶42

41/JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR

Munfed S/O Shri Jan Mohmmad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munfed S/O Shri Jan Mohmmad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Son of Shri Ramnarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Sheela Devi Wife of Shri Jethanand Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep @ Nikku S/O Dharampal Vs State of Rajasthan

United India Insurance Company Limited, Vs Savita W/O Late Arun Kumar

Kedarnath Gupta S/O Sh. Shyamlal Gupta Vs Veyant Kaur W/O Late Sh. Mahendra Singh

Hanuman Sahay Saini S/O Nand Ram Vs State of Rajasthan