Disposed¶24

Divya Saini D/O Nathu Ram Saini, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Mar 2026CRLW/396/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 396/2026, Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), decided 18/03/2026 by Justice Anil Kumar Upman. Petitioners Divya Saini and Manohar Bunkar sought protection from private respondents No.6 to 8 (Nathuram, Banwari Lal and Mahesh Saini) after their marriage of 10.03.2026, alleging continuous threats. Court disposed of the petition directing the petitioners to apply to the SHO, Police Station Daulatpura, Jaipur, and directing that SHO to provide protection and ensure no harm; order without prejudice to any pending civil/criminal proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to file a protection application before respondent No.5 (SHO, Police Station Daulatpura, District Jaipur), who is directed to provide protection upon such application and ensure no harm is caused to the petitioners. ¶24

Divya Saini D/O Nathu Ram Saini, Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:11724]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 396/2026

¶4

Divya Saini D/o Nathu Ram Saini, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Lodha Ki Dhani, Nindar, Harmada, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

Manohar Bunkar S/o Dhanna Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mothu Ka Bas, Chetawala, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶9

The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶10

The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur.

¶11

The SHO, Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur. 5. The SHO, Police Station Daulatpura, District Jaipur. 6. Nathuram Saini S/o Babulal Saini, 7. Banwari Lal Saini S/o Babulal Saini, 8. Mahesh Saini S/o Babulal Saini,

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv., with Ms. VijayLaxmi Jangid,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with
	Mr. M.S. Shekhawat,PP

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order

¶15

18/03/2026

¶16

Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled.

¶17

Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.

¶18

This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondents No.6 to 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

(2 of 2)

[2026:RJ-JP:11724]

[CRLW-396/2026]

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Nagar Arya Samaj Sansthan, Babu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur on 10.03.2026 and same has been registered in the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondents No.6 to 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.

¶23

In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5 - Station House Officer, Police Station Daulatpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) and respondent No.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.

¶24

6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶25

Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶26

However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.

¶27

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶28

MADAN/203

Divya Saini D/O Nathu Ram Saini, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Divya Saini D/O Nathu Ram Saini, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Bairwa S/O Shri Devlal Bairwa, Vs State of Rajasthan

Balu Alias Ramavtar Son of Prema Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Sharma S/O Late Shri Gopi Ram Sharma, Vs State of Rajasthan

Nikita Kumari Daughter of Shri Dharamveer Singh, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sunita Bai D/O Hemraj Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramniwas Yadav S/O Shri Narayan Lal Yadav, Vs the State of Rajasthan