A married couple sought police protection from relatives opposed to their marriage. The court directed them to file an application before the concerned SHO, who was to provide adequate protection as per law and ensure no harm was caused. Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:5098]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 188/2026
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 3)
[2026:RJ-JP:5098]
[CRLW-188/2026]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
03/02/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:5098]
[CRLW-188/2026]
(3 of 3)
seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
Anu /250
1 issue framed by the court
Whether protection should be granted to a married couple apprehending threat to life and liberty from family members opposed to their marriage.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.Relied on
AIR 2006 SC 2522 · Who else cites this
Geeta Jakhar
Vijay Rolaniya
State of Rajasthan
The Director General of Police
The Superintendent of Police, Sikar
Shankarlal Jakhar
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
