Criminal revision petition in which the court recorded that the cost amount had been deposited in compliance with its earlier order and the notice stood discharged, leaving nothing further; the petition was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 662/2026
Rameshwar Lal S/o Gangu Ram
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
13/05/2026
bl U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dh ikyuk esa dksLV jkf'k tek gks pqdh gSA fuxjkuh ;kfpdk iwoZ ls fuLrkfjr gS] vr% vc dksbZ dk;Zokgh 'ks"k ugha gSA rnuqlkj izdj.k nkf[ky nQ~rj gksA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /73
Rameshwar Lal S/o Gangu Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
