Allowed¶25

Lokesh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Ghanshyam Prasad Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Mar 2026CRLMP/992/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashment of FIR after amicable settlement/compromise between parties; petition under Section 528 BNSS; FIR No.621/2022, P.S. Kho-Nagoriyan, Jaipur City (East); offences under Sections 323, 341, 365 & 379 IPC; SHO verification report dated 20.02.2026; reliance on Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934) and State of Haryana v. Choudhary Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604); Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; Justice Anil Kumar Upman; decided 05/03/2026; CRLMP-992/2026; FIR quashed and set aside; stay and pending applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.621/2022 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) quashed and set aside; stay application and pending application(s) disposed of. ¶25

Lokesh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Ghanshyam Prasad Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

FIR No.621/2022 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) quashed and set aside; stay application and pending application(s) disposed of.

¶25

Issue for consideration

Whether FIR No.621/2022 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East), for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 365 & 379 of IPC, ought to be quashed in view of the amicable settlement/compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶17

Court's answer

The present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and in State of Haryana v. Choudhary Bhajan Lal.

¶24

Ratio / Principle

Since the parties resolved their dispute amicably and arrived at a compromise, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶24

Key takeaways

The criminal misc. petition is allowed and FIR No.621/2022 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) is quashed and set aside.ratio¶25

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench (Anil Kumar Upman, J.), order dated 05/03/2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 992/2026 [CRLMP-992/2026]: Accused-petitioners moved under Section 528 of BNSS to quash FIR No.621/2022 of Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East), registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 365 & 379 of IPC. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the parties had settled their dispute amicably and annexed a written compromise; the learned Public Prosecutor placed a SHO verification report dated 20.02.2026 confirming the compromise, which was taken on record, and counsel for the complainant did not dispute the factum of compromise. Holding the case wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934) and State of Haryana v. Choudhary Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604), the Court allowed the petition and quashed and set aside the FIR in view of the compromise; the stay application and pending applications stood disposed of.

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:9628]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 992/2026

¶4

Lokesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ghanshyam Prasad Meena, R/o Ratanpura, Lalsot, District Dausa.

¶5

Dilip Kumar Meena S/o Shri Kailash Meena, R/o Bagri, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa.

¶6

Siyaram Meena S/o Shri Kishan Lal Meena, R/o Bagri, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa.

¶7

Vinod Meena S/o Shri Kanjiram Meena, R/o Daroga Wali Dhani, Suratpura, Mandari, District Dausa.

¶8

Sapna Meena D/o Shrighanshyam Meena, R/o Opp. Petrol Pump, Mandawari, District Dausa.

¶9

----Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Sher Singh Meena S/o Ramsingh Meena, R/o Sukar, Bamanwas, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	:	Ms. Anju Meena
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
		Mr. Ashok Kumar Bairwa, for complainant

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶15

Order

¶16

05/03/2026

¶17

By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.621/2022 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East), for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 365 & 379 of IPC.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have

¶19

settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.

[2026:RJ-JP:9628]

[CRLMP-992/2026]

(2 of 2)

Learned Public Prosecutor places verification report dated 20.02.2026 received from the SHO, Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East). According to which, parties have entered into compromise. The said report is taken on record.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [ AIR 1992 SC 604 ] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶25

In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.621/2022 registered at Police Station KhoNagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.

¶26

Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶27

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶28

CHARU SONI /48

Lokesh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Ghanshyam Prasad Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lokesh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Ghanshyam Prasad Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra S/O Girdharilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Suryakant Gupta S/O Shambudayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Brajvardhan S/O Shri Rambabu Vs State of Rajasthan

Sharafat Khan S/O Shri Inayat Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishan Lal Yadav Son of Shri Sohan Lal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Radhika Kataria W/O Aman Choudhary, Vs State of Rajasthan